Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Educational institutes should not pay any sort of role in career making process. It is whole and sole students’ perspective. Encouraging students might not help them rather they might get misguided. Hence, I strongly disagree with the claim.
First of all, there is no lucrative career without hard work and dedication, and dedication being on up ground here. One only shows dedication and sincerity where his or her interest lies. As a study there is no one single career or set of careers that can be graphed under a high profitable, money making job. Every career can be turned into “lucrative career’ if one intends to.
Educational institutes throughout the world run on a comma principle of “benefiting and development of students”. This insight is a complete contrary of the claim presented. An art or music loving student if encouraged for a 9 to 5 corporate job, he/she will not be able to keep up with it. This might lead to failures and furthermore to medical cases of depression. Where on the other hand if he/she was encouraged and supported for his choice, he/she might end up being more successful in life and more importantly Happy.
The encouragement for a lucrative career might help some and increase the Alumni profile of the institutes but will for sure ruin some lives which is a greater gamble. Educational institutes should rather support the viewpoint and careers students choose for themselves on what students feel right. Students expect an unbiased help from the institutes along with education.
The claim might seem tempting enough to attract students but deep down it is a curse in disguise that should not be supported or implemented any any educational institutions in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
...ng job. Every career can be turned into “lucrative career’ if one intends to. ...
^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'job' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'jobs'.
Suggestion: jobs
...nt if encouraged for a 9 to 5 corporate job, he/she will not be able to keep up wit...
^^^
Line 9, column 142, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: any
... should not be supported or implemented any any educational institutions in the future....
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, sort of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 286.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06993006993 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89679353476 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583916083916 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7136390364 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2941176471 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8235294118 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70588235294 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282931578051 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884452037362 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583245393711 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156786962571 0.150359130593 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729295784649 0.0667264976115 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.