Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
It is irrefutable that education is an asset for every children in the view of preparing them to face the real world. The assertion states that students should be motivated by their schools or Universities to opt the course that would fetch them money making jobs. However, instead of moving towards monetary comfort for peaceful life, it would be best for the kids students to move in the path of their dream and passion where the real serene lies. The outline of the statement is a contentious one and need scrupulous concomitant with cogent analysis along with a lucid delineation.
Admittedly, any individual would get bored of certain tasks if did without any interest for the work. Likewise, provided that an educational institution forces students to take up the specialisation in which the student has no inclination, they would not be able to focus in their learning. Students should have the liberty in selecting the career path independently, where they really feel that they would fit into. Labouring in a lucrative job for the sake of renumeration by leaving behind the passion on had would not let the life be lived tranquil. As a result, the work done by the individual in a non interested job would not be commendable as like as when one does his dream job.
In addition to that, lack of interest would not nurture the skills or updation required for the people to sustain in the area. Nowadays, most of the students are insisted to take up professional courses such as doctor, medicine etc., to procure well paid job, considering that these jobs would level up the social as well as financial status of the individuals. For instance, student who has a passion for dance and wants to fledge a career in dancing, if obviated and forced to join engineering just for a better salary, the person would strive hard to learn and to become expertise. The student would have reached heights when he had given the opportunity to choose dance as his career. Therefore, it is clear that schools and colleges should not intervene in the career decision of students.
Nevertheless, the proponents of the affirmation would impose an opposite school of thought that ulterior motive of education is securing a high yielding job and all the arduous efforts imposed on studying is to get a fruitful job in the future. However, any rewarding job is actually rewarding when the job complements the interest and dream of a person. Thus, the sole responsibility of the schools is to help the student identify their passion and guide them to develop their adroit in their penchant area to seek lucrative jobs in that field. A person can shine in a career only if he has a passion or dream about the field.
To put the enunciation in a nutshell, it is the universities’ job to set a good career path for their students, albeit the concern of the students should also be considered and should leave the choice of selecting the prospective area of interest according to their zeal and should implement techniques to foster the skills of the students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: BORED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'bored with'?
Suggestion: bored with
.... Admittedly, any individual would get bored of certain tasks if did without any intere...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2527.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 524.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82251908397 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7844588288 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76426208824 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488549618321 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 781.2 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5539337341 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5789473684 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73684210526 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221624541503 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729771207188 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050933387895 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132710727692 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189062976655 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.