Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Choosing a field of study is a major question confronting students as they embark upon higher education. There is often dilemma about whether one should choose a course one is interested or passionate about or one which helps pursue a career with potential to earn more money. I think the students who should be given freedom to choose their field of choice rather than educational institutions actively encouraging them to choose a field of study with scope for lucrative career.
To start with, If the majority of students choosing high-paying professions will work in those areas, then there will be a crisis in low-paid areas. To draw a typical illustration one could examine the current situation with Russians teachers. As a consequence of the fact that in the 90s it was one of the lowest paid professions and many teachers faced the choice of either changing jobs or going hungry, only a small number of students chose teaching at school as their profession at that time. As a result, there is now a crisis of teaching and every year the level of school education falls. Consequently, if students choose only high-paying jobs, in other areas, low-paid, can alert the crisis.
Moreover, Generally, there may not be enough jobs in high-paying fields for all students.
As a result, there will be a surplus of job seekers in a high-paying area and employers can reduce wages. And then the student's plans to receive a high salary can collapse. A similar situation was again in Russia, when in the 90s the most profitable areas were considered to be law and accounting. A lot of students went to study these Sciences. Even the smallest universities have departments of accounting and law. But when all these students graduated from universities and started looking for work the labor market was so saturated that the salaries of lawyers and accountants were reduced tenfold. Until now, decades later, because of the huge number of lawyers and accountants in these areas, extremely small salaries.
All that distress could have easily been avoided if only students in choosing a profession were not guided by profit alone.
Conversely, the proponents of universities must provide truthful information to prospective students about expected earnings stand their ground, stating that high profits are the best motivation for good studies. However, the motivation for learning can also be an inspiring example of high qualification of parents in any field, interest in the study of this area, interest in science in General, the desire to make a scientific breakthrough or change the world for the better.
Nonetheless, this issue remains controversial and multifaceted, and being aware of its complexity might not only help an individual understand his or her motives, but also choose future profession.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 413, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...her changing jobs or going hungry, only a small number of students chose teaching at school as th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to teach'.
Suggestion: to teach
..., only a small number of students chose teaching at school as their profession at that t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, however, if, look, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, then, i think, in general, as a result, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2372.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 459.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16775599129 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86279649646 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 721.8 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8784855265 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.6 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.95 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205003592685 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059826939817 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728661657824 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914712531059 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876510508677 0.0667264976115 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.