Educators should take students' interests into account when planning the content of the courses they teach.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The issue statement implies that the educators or the teachers who are teaching a particular course should take the interests and likings of the students into consideration when they are planning the contents of the course. This is an agreeable suggestion as it will help both the educators and the students'. Such a mutual benefit has never harmed anyone.
If the educators who are given the responsibility to teach a particular course take the students' interest into consideration it will help them to teach the course more efficiently as the students will start developing an interest in the course. When students develop an interest towards a particular course they take extra efforts to know more about the contents of the course. They might even carry out extra research about the contents if they develop a liking towards the course.
A liking towards the course can be developed in two cases, if the students has an inherent liking towards the course due to some external factor or he develops a liking towards the course because of the way that it is taught. In order to develop such interest the way the educator teaches as well as the kind of content he conveys during the course is very important. Also to decide the content of the course like what all subtopics are needed to be covered and other such details it would be benificial for the educator to find out about the students' interests.
The students' interests can be found out by consulting with the students who have already completed this course. Their feedback would be helpful in deciding what the students feel is relevant imformation which needs to be covered in the course and what is the content which can be overlooked. The passed out students' are the ones who can give an unbiased opinion about the contents which can help the educator in shaping the structure of the course.
Conversely, sometimes such recommendation can be misleading as there might be some feedback from some students who would have been disinterested towards particular contents in the course and hence would like the educator to ignore it but in reality such content might be an integral part of the course which would provide the bases for various topics which are to be covered in the course.
Hence, we can see that the students' interests are very subjective so proper care should be taken in deciding the contents of the course. The interests of the students' should be an important factor in deciding the contents but it should not be the only factor in making the decision. Various other factors such as application of the content, the basics of the course, the relevance of the content to the modern world and other like these should also be taken into consideration. To conclude, the descision regarding the content of the course is a very important one and should be carefully taken.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t developing an interest in the course. When students develop an interest towards a ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ys during the course is very important. Also to decide the content of the course lik...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'conversely', 'hence', 'if', 'look', 'regarding', 'so', 'well', 'kind of', 'such as', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.229755178908 0.240241500013 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.16384180791 0.157235817809 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0677966101695 0.0880659088768 77% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0320150659134 0.0497285424764 64% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0282485875706 0.0444667217837 64% => OK
Prepositions: 0.112994350282 0.12292977631 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0489642184557 0.0406280797675 121% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.81284939803 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0244821092279 0.030933414821 79% => OK
Particles: 0.00564971751412 0.0016655270985 339% => OK
Determiners: 0.16384180791 0.0997080785238 164% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.045197740113 0.0249443105267 181% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0282485875706 0.0148568991511 190% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2895.0 2732.02544248 106% => OK
No of words: 487.0 452.878318584 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94455852156 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.363449691992 0.366273622748 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.279260780287 0.280924506359 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.184804928131 0.200843997647 92% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.106776180698 0.132149295362 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81284939803 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 219.290929204 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.373716632444 0.48968727796 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 41.9251532001 55.4138127331 76% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 28.6470588235 23.380412469 123% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.4781299244 59.4972553346 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.294117647 141.124799967 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6470588235 23.380412469 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.705882352941 0.674092028746 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 56.5731368523 51.4728631049 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.74789915966 1.64882698954 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.535548196307 0.391690518653 137% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.236852101254 0.123202303941 192% => Sentence is so close to another sentence.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.11485065079 0.077325440228 149% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.733321745864 0.547984918172 134% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.168460286909 0.149214159877 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.302828609502 0.161403998019 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104645275619 0.0892212321368 117% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.574240565226 0.385218514788 149% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0477686095342 0.0692045440612 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.408043718821 0.275328986314 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612876242588 0.0653680567796 94% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88274336283 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 14.0 7.22455752212 194% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.