The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
“A government is chosen for the people, by the people”- is a phrase often heard, illustrating that people’s opinion is the key factor in forming a government. People expect that their candidate must serve the nation’s needs and work for citizen’s welfare. One can argue that the effectiveness of a country’s leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country’s citizen but that is illogical. A leader is the representative of the country and they not only have to work for the well-being of their citizens but also in maintaining global ties.
Numerous different factors define the effectiveness of a leader. The economy is one of the major factors that aid a country to develop. In long run, if there is abate in a country’s economy, the leader is termed as ineffective. Hence, it is important to think of the future too. The number of corruption cases during the government’s term is also a key factor as an idealistic government would be corruption-free. A leader has to work towards enhancing the education quality of a country and checking that all the sections of society get an equal chance towards a better future. Therefore, thinking of the long run for measuring the effectiveness and quality of a leader is substantial.
A country’s leader is expected to enhance global ties and maintain good relation with other country’s leader. Making allies helps in improving the trade of goods between the countries, further leading to improving business. Also, in case of some catastrophe, a country could depend upon its allies for help. For example, in this coronavirus-era, when the cases in India started to surge to a gargantuan level, a lot of countries came forward to India’s aid due to maintaining good relations in the past. A leader has to take care of the immigrants too, by providing them with a haven and a shelter if required.
In conclusion, it is important to understand that citizen’s well-being is just one of the numerous factors in measuring the effectiveness of a leader. It includes various factors but is not limited to the citizen’s of a country but the whole world’s opinion is substantial.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'Numerous'.
Suggestion: Numerous
...s but also in maintaining global ties. Numerous different factors define the effectiveness of a l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 161, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'abated'.
Suggestion: abated
...ry to develop. In long run, if there is abate in a country’s economy, the leader is t...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e whole world’s opinion is substantial.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 360.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03055555556 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16621707335 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491666666667 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6368419459 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.611111111 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267284542755 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936072163794 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938156663062 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176291115653 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452747123833 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.