The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position
Over the time, the stature of a leader has been always recognized as essential for the development of his or her country and has played a crucial role in the pursuit of further progress. The person in power achieve this goal when the citizens of his country have a proper attitude with each other and towards their nation and demonstrate advanced skills, to which they make their country worldwide competitive.
First and foremost, leaders are responsible for the advancement of their nation because they provide both educational and job opportunities to the local people, that can enforce their own abilities. Americans are an example, because they prove to be multi-tasks, they have time management, and more independence rather than other communities. The majority of Italian people, for instance, live with their parents until the age of forty because they do not have chance to work, so they cannot strengthen early some personal skills as time management or independence due to their calm lifestyle.
In addition, leaders make people respect the rules by touting and approving severe laws. German government offers an example. Indeed, the community is respectful and organized. Also, they benefit of a high-quality education that make them prepared and ready to partecipate in a future workplace.
In contrast, roles are made to be broken. In other words, leaders cannot control completely illegal actions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'has' and 'been'.
Suggestion: has always been
Over the time, the stature of a leader has been always recognized as essential for the develop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, then, for instance, in addition, in contrast, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 58.6224719101 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1195.0 2235.4752809 53% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 225.0 442.535393258 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31111111111 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.55969084622 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82685533962 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.64 0.4932671777 130% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 704.065955056 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.886667738 60.3974514979 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.636363636 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 5.21951772744 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104434814808 0.243740707755 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374150381327 0.0831039109588 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03573491089 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0650215369299 0.150359130593 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455456457517 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.