Environmental issue is one of the most important factor in this 21st century. Pollution is one of the major cause of country not developing as rapidly as it should. The prompt suggests that multinational companies should be left aside when environmnetal policies are imposed. In my opinion, I strongly disagree to the claim for several reasons.
To begin with, multinational companies are huge companies. They have all the resources that can be used to mitigate the enviromental issues or say pollution. In contrast to the multinational companies, there are small companies which does not have adequate capital. It is hard for them to comply all the rules of policies but still they do. So, companies with large capital, abundant resources should obviously not let go without following the imposed policies.For example, Samsung is one of the biggest cell phone industry and they can go to any extent to boost their profits and sales, though it will help the economy in long run. However, if they can do all the required things to boost their sales and profits, why not to take care of environment when it is one of the major factor affecting our world.
Furthermore, rules and policies should be equal for everyone. This makes sure that no one takes any unethical advantage which wil lead to damage the environment. Small companies would be encouraged to follow the rules and policies, if large companies are doing the same thing. For instance, environmental policies are set upon 100 small scale companies and one multinantional company is left. No matter how much enviromental damage is mitigated by all the small companies , large company will eventually compensate that effect by deteriorating the environment as it was not under any policy. However one large company and set of 100 small companies are going to boost the economy in almost same proportion. So, why MNC's should not have any rules imposed on them.
Finally, large companies are likely to cause more environmental problems to the country than small scale companies. Moreover, if they are set free, no matter how many laws are imposed on small scale companies, environment is going to be in the worst condition. It makes no sense to not impose rules on large companies, just because they are one of the major factor to boost the country's economy. Health issues are severe one. Nations should be wary of the situation that is caused by all the environmental issues and pollution all around the globe. It does not make any sense to not impose rules on large companies, as these companies are not going to share their profits with nation or people living in the nation. Neither it is something like they cause less sever issues to the environment.
To sum up my points, I strongly oppose to the policy of not imposing rules to protect the environment of multi national companies for above reasons. Also, nature and the earth should be protected from all the factors that affects it.Environmental issue is one of the most important factor in this 21st century. Pollution is one of the major cause of country not developing as rapidly as it should. The prompt suggests that multinational companies should be left aside when environmnetal policies are imposed. In my opinion, I strongly disagree to the claim for several reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
... without following the imposed policies.For example, Samsung is one of the biggest ...
^^^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e industry and they can go to any extent to boost their profits and sales, though...
^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (wil) must be used with a third-person verb: 'leads'.
Suggestion: leads
...takes any unethical advantage which wil lead to damage the environment. Small compan...
^^^^
Line 5, column 472, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... is mitigated by all the small companies , large company will eventually compensat...
^^
Line 9, column 234, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Environmental
...ed from all the factors that affects it.Environmental issue is one of the most important fact...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee to the claim for several reasons.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, for example, for instance, in contrast, in contrast to, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2757.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 553.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98553345389 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84932490483 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78810290978 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.410488245931 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 884.7 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.5052148636 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0689655172 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0689655172 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58620689655 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123109531508 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444079971358 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365506137997 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0888746101626 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281342543315 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.