Facts are stubborn things. They cannot be altered by our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion.
The author claims that facts cannot be changed by personal inclinations and emotions. In my view, except those facts established on the erroneous bases, in general, it cannot be changed merely through personal feeling.
I concede that an ostensible fact that is derived from inaccurate process sometimes may be modified by evidences from more advance or precise observation. These kind of events usually happen in the area of academic. In the medieval time, the earth once be deemed as the center of the universe. Because the “fact” that people got from their imprecise observation: moon, stars, and the sun are orbited around us. Yet the new discovery from the modern instruments show that the earth just one of planets orbiting the sun.
However, facts are the objective and substantial things that underlying our society and knowledges. Considering the area of science. Our profound and sound scientific basis is undergirded by a series of facts that come from innumerable observations by scientist in the history. These recognized facts have been tested and substantiated by many erudite people, it cannot be discarded or objected merely by the personal feeling or inclination. For example, some people don’t believe in that the earth is round for their individual propensity no matter from their instincts or religious beliefs. However, the fact that that earth is round is still valid since it has been held by various evidences from clear pictures taken from outer space to sailor’s real experiences. Once these scientific fact can be altered easily by one’s love or hate, then our area of science will be defunct.
Facts also are concrete that can be used as the judgement by the police. In the criminal case, every suspects may claim that they are innocent, they may claim they didn’t present at the venue. However, the objective facts such as camera records, finger prints, or DNA residue can be a potent things to convict suspects. By contrast, if a police man can dictate the guilt of suspects by their arbitrary preferences from their stereotype, such as that stray people are more susceptible for stealing or that people with tattoo tend to robber, them the equity and objectiveness of judicial system will collapse.
To sum up, the facts form the basis not only of our knowledge but of the order in the society. A fact can only be undermined by more accurate and advance truth but not by individual inclination.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...om more advance or precise observation. These kind of events usually happen in the area of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 293, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'thing'?
Suggestion: thing
... prints, or DNA residue can be a potent things to convict suspects. By contrast, if a ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 586, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the equity and objectiveness of judicial system will collapse. To sum up, the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, then, for example, in general, kind of, such as, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07178217822 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71259461442 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542079207921 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4130470398 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.45 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271274394519 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824682078431 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740551286373 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144563368404 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060021147186 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.