fggxxf
There is a saying "Be good in one thing is all you need to be successful". Whether it is a gardening, body-building or even a chemist if you learn that one skill diligently you will excel in your life. I most likely agree with the author that educational institutional focus on teaching the skills that fall in the area of student's interest and then further act of refinement to prepare him for real life workspace.
The primary reason for my belief is the students straight out of school are very ambivalent about their career choices. they studied plethora of subjects and are confused which subject should they choose to study in college that can act as a bread and butter for their life. This dilemma leads them to choose the wrong major that turn out to be a wrong choice if they could not able to grasp the subject during their undergraduate studies. This is where college councilors help students to understand their active interest and pursue them to study the subject they will enjoy. Therefore, educational institutions play a necessary in making important decision for recent school graduate students.
Second, Educational institutes like School and Colleges have all necessary resources that are needed to teach students about their subjects. For instance, in freshmen year I took Computer Science major as everyone in my family is a Computer engineer. But I could not stand the coding classes consequently, failing in most of my subjects. My adviser called me in his office and after few counselling sessions with me and my parents together I was confirmed that I like mechanical engineering more than my previous major. I chose the same and graduated with CGPA 4.5 out of 5, which is a great accomplishment for me. I could not able to do that without the excellent teacher who taught me pragmatically not only in the class rooms but also in the laboratories. After my three years, college even helped me in finding my internship so that I can be trained with real-life work professional.
However, it is true that succeeding in colleges is more into he hands of the students rather educating staff as he is the one who has to spend good amount of time in the library revising notes that he made during lecture, but it could not be possible for a student to understand the deep concept without a help of an excellent teacher and certainly cannot be possible without the access of engineering laboratory assistants. Therefore, College provide us the necessary resources that is needed to doing self- studying after lectures, in library or at home.
In conclusion, due to the reasons stated above I agree with the author opinion about educational institute responsibilities for pursuing the students to study their field of interest so that they can excel in their future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ife. I most likely agree with the author that educational institutional focus on ...
^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... ambivalent about their career choices. they studied plethora of subjects and are co...
^^^^
Line 9, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...so that they can excel in their future.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, as to, for instance, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 33.0505617978 194% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2334.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 474.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92405063291 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8506598915 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510548523207 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 725.4 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.3705455453 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.666666667 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27777777778 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.243740707755 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0831039109588 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150359130593 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.