'The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.“Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of

Essay topics:

'The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.

“Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station’s coverage of weather and local news. In addition, local businesses that used to advertise during our late-night news program have just canceled their advertising contracts with us. Therefore, in order to attract more viewers to the program and to avoid losing any further advertising revenues, we should restore the time devoted to weather and local news to its former level.”

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence would be needed in order to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

Memorandum from a business manager of the late night televesion staion says devoting more time to national news rather than weather updates has sharpely resulted in a sense of dejection and abstinence in the viewership that has ultimately given rise to increased customer compliants.

For a televesion station to run its business successfuly, various factors of the audience play role in deciding the vieweship numbers. To sustain the business, a television manager must understand the pulse of the audience , weekly, through TRP (Television reporting performane). These reports aptly gain and provide insights about the mood and interests of the audience in a more subtle way. In case of late night news programs, audience expect breif updates of each incident that would have happened in the course of a day where trend of the day or mostly, for a period of a week decides the tolerance levels of the audience. Parochial focus on weather updates alone, by the televesion news program, seems myopic and wrongul at various levels.

For example, at the times of elections in a region, audience expect news mainly focussed on politics, ratrher than weather forecast. This is natural and a television business firm, if pudent, must adapt as accordingly to the taste of the spectator. To quote one more, during a popular world cup season or even any olympic event, audience expect the programs to accomodate sports news a lion share in the stipulated time. Similarly, this television program could have fixed the table of contents at the time of a turbulent or catstrophic waether conditions where audience would very well expect more of a weather updates.

However, nature and its climatic conditions do form an integral part of the human society and frequent updates of the same is an eternal necessity for an individual. To an extent business manager could be right and may have to increase the time slot for weather updates.

But, nonetheless, holistically, audience deal more with germane and concurrent things in a mundane life. Late night television programs should be quite adaptive and sensational which serve as a daily dose of entertaiment and knowledge for the viewers to remain competative and be aware of the surroundings in a more efficient way as most of the indiviuduals form a part of working class of the society.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ust understand the pulse of the audience , weekly, through TRP Television reportin...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, however, if, may, nonetheless, similarly, so, well, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 33.0505617978 21% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 383.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12010443864 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80905339549 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55091383812 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6412281919 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.071428571 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3571428571 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292193404708 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958758988274 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779064936582 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159902716675 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904274012211 0.0667264976115 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.