Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free.
With the unprecedented growth in technology, debate on the education system is has been a major topic around the globe. Some scholars believe that following the formal traditional approach of education is the accurate way to learn and growth of a student. While I almost do not agree with this premise due to the below reasons. However, I do concede that there a few scenarios where not the following education does not hold water.
Firstly, Formal education restricts us to think beyond the box because, Nowadays this type of education has ample of programs which prevents student to think, apply and analyze the knowledge practically. For example, a student has back-to-back many classes in school, mostly they have theoretical or virtual classes where a teacher demonstrates the concept orally or virtually. Students do not have an opportunity to interact or view the concept originally. If a student would have got a chance to interact personally then the student might be got a chance to have a clear view about the concept and it is possible that a student develops more interest and have thoughts regarding which in future can lead to some discovery. Furthermore, Einstein had discovered the law of gravity when an apple fell on his head. Thus, seeing an apple falling and actually experiencing the situation raised a thought which eventually led to one of the greatest discoveries in history. Thus, instead of following normal structure, tweaking teaching approaches and methodologies can lead to better understanding in students and can cause them to think beyond the limit.
Secondly, following the modern approach of education like visiting to a museum when studying arts subject can help to remember longer than studying the bookish language. While, studying through books, a student can imagine a few scenarios,s and many a times concepts are obscured in students' minds. They do not get a clear understanding and have many unsolved doubts, which will restrict students' thought processing. For example, the memories of a field trip remain fresh in a students’ mind than a theory lecture.
Moreover, Formal education is a mundane process for a student, they do not like going to school because they have to sit in a class for hours and forcefully grasping things. When leaves the student tired and no interest to think about what they have learned. Thus, Instead of supporting a mundane approach, some interactive approach is necessary to make actual implementation of learned concepts.
However, there are a few limitations to the non-formal approach, if the nonformal approach is followed in every subject it would be difficult to all syllabus and deep concepts. Thus, a non-formal education system can be introduced for the subjects which can be better explained with real-time examples so as to get a better understanding and which will make students think and apply knowledge in real-time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 257, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e way to learn and growth of a student. While I almost do not agree with this premise...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had got'?
Suggestion: had got
...ew the concept originally. If a student would have got a chance to interact personally then th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 818, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty when an apple fell on his head. Thus, seeing an apple falling and actually exp...
^^
Line 4, column 238, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , s
...s, a student can imagine a few scenarios,s and many a times concepts are obscured ...
^^
Line 6, column 302, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...etter explained with real-time examples so as to get a better understanding and which wi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2443.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 473.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16490486258 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8952066158 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498942917548 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 747.9 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.153567813 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.15 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.65 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0865199725034 0.243740707755 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0301235696365 0.0831039109588 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340154365587 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0566206580297 0.150359130593 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016836358886 0.0667264976115 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.