The goal of politics should not be the pursuit of an ideal, but rather the search for common ground and reasonable consensus
To some people, ideal sounds almost somewhat impossible goal to achieve. however, even though we cannot pursue an ideal all the time in every political issue, we have to try to get to an ideal, because the meaning of ideal has always changed, and there are political issues that requires ideal, such as education and human rights.
In the past, people thought democracy is an ideal that humans are not prepared to have. however, it became a common ground to have rights to vote and freedom of speech in the usa. if we only search for common ground and reasonable consensus, we would not have been able to change into this society. it was achieved because of politicians who relentlessly tried to realize their ideal, and that effort changed what we believe as norms now. so since meaning of ideal has always changed according to improvements in the society, pursuits of an ideal lead to increasing of well-being.
Also, especially politics related to human rights are improved by pursuing ideal. because those are directly related to well-being of citizens. For example, in south korea, under Park’s regime, which deprived freedom of speech, freedom of publication, and many other violations against human rights, some people believed that we don’t need change in a society, which means that we only need to comply to rules given by the strongest party. however, there were some politicians that denied it and chased ideal to make south korea better place, who led impeachment of the regime. After the impeachment, people all experienced how great it is to achieve ideal, which showed realizing ideal is not an impossible goal.
however, diplomatic politics can’t always pursue ideals, which is better to follow norms. it is because if a nation try to break a norm, it can lead into huge disaster, such as wars. For example, in south korea, ideally, it is better to remove north korea, since south korea and north korea are still under Korean war. however, it is better to solve conflicts according to common ground and consensus between usa, China, Russia, and all other countries. Therefore, when chasing ideals can bring more conflicts, it is better to avoid it.
In conclusion, it is partly true that the goals of politics should be searching for common ground and reasonable consensus, if pursuing ideal is harmful. however, trying to get an ideal can make a society better, and if it is related to human rights, doing so is effectively make many citizens’ lives better.new roman",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times new roman"">
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...st somewhat impossible goal to achieve. however, even though we cannot pursue an ideal ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al, such as education and human rights. In the past, people thought democracy is...
^^^
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...l that humans are not prepared to have. however, it became a common ground to have righ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 181, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... vote and freedom of speech in the usa. if we only search for common ground and re...
^^
Line 2, column 300, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... been able to change into this society. it was achieved because of politicians who...
^^
Line 2, column 440, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...t changed what we believe as norms now. so since meaning of ideal has always chang...
^^
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
... rights are improved by pursuing ideal. because those are directly related to well-bein...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 452, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... to rules given by the strongest party. however, there were some politicians that denie...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ng ideal is not an impossible goal. however, diplomatic politics can't always ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 97, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...deals, which is better to follow norms. it is because if a nation try to break a n...
^^
Line 6, column 326, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...north korea are still under Korean war. however, it is better to solve conflicts accord...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 156, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...onsensus, if pursuing ideal is harmful. however, trying to get an ideal can make a soci...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 277, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'made'.
Suggestion: made
...o human rights, doing so is effectively make many citizens' lives better.new ro...
^^^^
Line 8, column 330, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , serif
...izens' lives better.new roman',serif; mso-fareast-font-family:'Times ne...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2165.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 422.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13033175355 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09831653865 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497630331754 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2415800663 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.947368421 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2105263158 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31578947368 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 7.80617977528 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324826472545 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109836892989 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126923036367 0.0758088955206 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190371574769 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707739120616 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.