Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve

Essay topics:

Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.

Government officials should definitely rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve because people would be thinking from their point of view. They want their needs to be fulfilled whether it be bad for the government.
The government officials should look into the matter by not only considering the views of a particular group of people, instead of concerning everyone’s interest while making a decision. The government functions with the help of funds they receive from the people, thus catering to the needs of only a few, will be a betrayal for others. For instance, during the days of draught, If a person approaches an official to explain the water scarcity problem in his area and demands for regular water supply in his house, for this grievance if the official agrees to provide regular water tanker service for his area, it would be partiality with the others who are facing the similar problem.
It is the responsibility of the government official to be unbiased in making decisions. He needs to think in all aspects before addressing any issue and avoid cursory decisions. For instance, In Bishnoi, a small town in Rajasthan, India "Chipko movement" took place. The people protested against deforestation by hugging the trees so as to prevent them from being cut. Hence if the government officials would have well thought through before making a cursory decision of recklessly cutting the trees listening to the views of only a few and dominating those of others, this protest won't have happened. Thus, it is very important for the government official to be unbiased and rely on his own judgement without letting others hamper his thoughts.
The government officials are there to serve the needs of people, but to fulfil those needs it is important that they are not affecting others interests. They have full access to government funds and have authority to use it wisely to serve the people. If an officer is to give compensation to people for their lands, which will be used by the government to carry out some project. In this case, the people will definitely demand more, but here it is in the hands of the official to assign appropriate compensation amount corresponding to their lands. Thus, it is very important for the official to think rationally and be stubborn on his own judgement rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people he serves.
In conclusion, I will say that the claim is very correct in all aspects that the Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve. As they are responsible to face the consequences of decisions they make.

Votes
Average: 5.1 (3 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...inst deforestation by hugging the trees so as to prevent them from being cut. Hence if t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...s so as to prevent them from being cut. Hence if the government officials would have ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 209, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... out the will of the people they serve. As they are responsible to face the conseq...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, so, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2274.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96506550218 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84180517929 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441048034934 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 695.7 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.2639906967 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.333333333 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38888888889 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.480862001098 0.243740707755 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170537626573 0.0831039109588 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.202403215889 0.0758088955206 267% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.362746524328 0.150359130593 241% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.219831328883 0.0667264976115 329% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.