Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Government officials are considered and in-fact given the most authority after the Ministers, in any form of government. Hence, it goes without saying, that government officials should be dependent on their own wit, rather than blindly carrying out the will of the people whom they serve. The question is do all government officials perform solely based on their wit? There are instances, where hundreds of people have died due to some dull-witted decisions taken by an avaricious official. On the contrary, on the several other instances, hundreds of people got another life, due to perspicacious decisions by courageous officials.
Dissolute officials receiving allurements from Ministers is mundane in any society/country. These Ministers go up to such an extent, in order to gain financial benefits and business profits, where bribing a government official does not seem to be a crime. Clearly, these officials do not bring into account, their judgements and intelligence, while signing a paper, which would allow loss of lives, capitulating of lands etc. Moreover, in some instances, penurious officials are left with no choices, other than accepting bribes. For example, in an instance in the city of Hyderabad, India, an entire family was destroyed and brought on road by a Minister. After several months of police and media investigations, it was found that one member of the family got into a brawl with the Minister months ago. The demolition of their home was sanctioned by a government official.
Principled officials are always immovable, and no amount of allurements can lure them. These officials are responsible and can be accounted for the impregnable development of the society. For example, a shopping mall or hospital construction is often done by avaricious Ministers. In these scenarios, the Ministers tend to bribe the officials so that some extra floors on the mall or hospital can be built. Had there been some unprincipled officials, they would have easily got lured by the ministers and had permitted construction of extra spaces beyond permission. One would wonder, what worse can happen with these extra spaces construction? These extra construction works can lead to huge devastations such as fire hazards, earthquake demolitions etc. Thanks to the principled officials, that we are safe, even if the society is full of such corrupt officials and Ministers.
United Public Service Commission of India is responsible and answerable to the common citizens of the country. The overall development of the an entire district is dependent on the performance of the UPSC officer. It is clear that such officers receive several requests from the common people, be it fulfillable or unfulfillable, principled or unprincipled. The acceptance of such requests is entirely dependent on the judgements of the officers. Their intelligence and management knowledge comes into play in such scenarios. For example, a principled UPSC officer would permit construction of a new school or a new hospital in villages under his/her authority. Whereas, an unprincipled UPSC officer would permit construction of liquor factories and gas pipelines, which would destroy local agricultural lands.
To conclude, moral judgements of government officials are individualistic, and an aberration from this would lead to significant unfavorable consequences for both the government official as well as the common citizens. It is hence, to be expected from the officials to reverent their respective authorities and keep their greed aside while on-duty. It is the common peoples' responsibility as well, to put unrealistic requests in front of the officials.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
...people whom they serve. The question is do all government officials perform solely...
^^
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'an' is left.
Suggestion: the; an
...the country. The overall development of the an entire district is dependent on the per...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...uences for both the government official as well as the common citizens. It is hence, to be...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...d aside while on-duty. It is the common peoples responsibility as well, to put unrealis...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, for example, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3089.0 2235.4752809 138% => OK
No of words: 569.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42882249561 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88402711743 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14391648807 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493848857645 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 962.1 704.065955056 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4966001592 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.966666667 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9666666667 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165357821746 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431816384908 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559497927591 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0987106777921 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596908804922 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 100.480337079 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.