Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The given statement states that governments should focus on immediate problems of today rather than solving future ones. There is no doubt that current problems need solutions and have to be focused, yet anticipated future problems can't be ignored. Many times future problems arise due to solutions of current problems, which are either remissed while working on solutions or never thought about it while implementing fixes to the present problems. Therefore, the given statement is acceptable with some modification that governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today first, but should not completely neglect future problems. There are numerous examples in the history which shows neglecting near future problems and just focusing on current ones caused serious effects on humanity.
Most of us know about space rocket Challenger crash, while working on this rocket, some of the anticipated problems were neglected, due to which it crashed. According challenger crash analysis, scientists were in time crunch to launch rocket, they tested rocket in the current conditions, and passed rocket launch. As soon as rocket launched, high pressure condition met and it exploded, this condition was completely neglected while working on it. None of the team member thought that high pressure can cause problem in future. Thus, it is important to have a foresight and anticipate future problem and its solution.
Another example in the same contest is New Delhi air pollution after diwali festitval. The whole city concentrated in firing crackers on diwali, without thinking after effects. Since diwali was in the winter, crackers smoke went into air and became fog after cooling down. People of the city were having hard time in breathing, and government annonced to close all the business and schools for three days. A quick fix to this problem was made by stopping work in few factories and limiting vehicles on roads, but pollution which is in air might get reduced with this solution for few days, but can't be eradicated. From air, this pollution will go water and soil and will have miasmic effects. Thus, city need to work on to come up with anticipated problems also along with present ones.
In conclusion, it is true, we will have better future with better present only, but it is important to work on anticipated problems also. Therefore, it is not ok to agree with the given statement if it supports neglecting anticipated problems completely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ocused, yet anticipated future problems cant be ignored. Many times future problems ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...er crash, while working on this rocket, some of the anticipated problems were neglected, du...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ht that high pressure can cause problem in future. Thus, it is important to have a foresi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 595, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ed with this solution for few days, but cant be eradicated. From air, this pollution...
^^^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...portant to work on anticipated problems also. Therefore, it is not ok to agree with ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, no doubt, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2079.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21052631579 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62387702142 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521303258145 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3479327682 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.421052632 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47368421053 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257318824271 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864467405765 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893212604798 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155106048039 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871420345613 0.0667264976115 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.