Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The role of government, conspicuously, is to ensure the smooth routine operation of the nation while forecasting the imminent perils and pitfalls. The assertion of choosing one over the other is not plausible and sensible. Even though there is commonly a tendency to divert out attention to those that might seem more emergent to be resolved, we shall distinguish ‘urgency’ from ‘importance’. To be, the effort made by governance, by all mean, require to simultaneously serve both of this interests as they are dependent on one another.
Inevitably, without the transition of today, there shall be no tomorrow. Thus, it is critical for legislators to attend to forthcoming issue that could bring alarming ramification to our economic, political or social welfare. Over the course of development, most governments have accelerated in bringing remedy to most breakdowns whether being natural calamity, political crisis, or economic depression. For instance, during the yearly flooding season in Vietnam, national endeavors would be concentrated on alleviating and recovering the damage to the victims. The global economic crisis, induced during the 90s, has coerced Hong Kong government to regulate the free flow market, which ensure a healthy financial playing field for economic growth. Also, the conspiracy of fraud involving Malaysia’s prime minister Najib has placed the issue at the frontier, urging the government to unravel to prevent social upheaval. As we know, the conviction of the public mass is once lost; it is lost forever.
In addition, for most political mechanism, greater support from the citizens is equivalent to a higher probability for a government to be re-elected. To general public, who is less likely attentive about the long-term strategies, their foresights would not go beyond what is currently magnified by mass media. Purely from a public relation perspective, politicians are encouraged to tackle issue that is under the spotlight. We could reference to most of the election schemes, conspicuously, contestants explicitly emphasize on their excelling ability in decipher most of the heating topics instead of addressing long term planning due to the ‘recency effect’. It might impose a negative connotation by using such imposition to win vote. However, what matters is that they live up to their promise to lead the nation ahead and triumph the adversity.
Nonetheless, it is unwise to omit the significance of long-term risk assessment and opts for only short-sighted victories. It would not make possible for a country to grow without reserving capacity to visualize and scrutinize what’s beyond the current context. Singapore would not have grown into a vivid monarch of economy, art and technology without the meticulous planning of its legendary former leader Li Guang Yao. So particularly, he has sketched out the shortcoming of its scarce land capacity, the potential risk of population expansion, the competitive edge of skillful human resource, etc. It is his vision to symmetrically scale all futuristic hazards instead of targeting temporal goals as they arise. The acceleration of the nation has validated the remarkable success of his prognosis for remote future.
In summary, from a political point of view, there is high proportion that government would gain higher pedestal with short-term ‘hit and run’ strategy. However, the real growth of a nation requires a long-term vigilant plan and risk forecast
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 505, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...require to simultaneously serve both of this interests as they are dependent on one ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...y for a government to be re-elected. To general public, who is less likely attentive about the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nonetheless, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2979.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 538.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53717472119 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22066185129 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 323.0 215.323595506 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600371747212 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 931.5 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2217763719 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.16 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.52 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0319477853999 0.243740707755 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00842869679011 0.0831039109588 10% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0148951666644 0.0758088955206 20% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.018091937034 0.150359130593 12% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165567413972 0.0667264976115 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.38706741573 123% => OK
difficult_words: 192.0 100.480337079 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.