In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
By asserting that beginner has higher potent to provide significant contributions rather than the experts, the statement has belittled the critical function of experts, whose experience and wisdom are of tremendous value. There has been no lack of preceding evident, indubitably, underpinning the essential role of experts in the survival of any profit-making organizations or industries.
As we consider the fields of science and technology, which require depth of knowledge and specialized skill set, the presence of experiential professionals is of utmost important. The pedestal bestowed on a scientist is dependent on his/her in-depth sights and discoveries on a specific research topic. Thus, a newcomer to the field is less likely to have a concrete foundation to attribute to a new body of knowledge. With the advent of technology, there have been rising number of young and enthusiastic programmers attempting to make it big in the industry. However, without the ingrained expertise in the market over years, freshmen would be less potent to obtain funding and support from the investors.
By encountering countless defeats and fiasco, experienced specialists are equipped with a great sense of forecasting, thereby increase their chance of success. This is especially relevant to consultants and analysts, whose problem identification and resolution strategy is of paramount importance. How could someone resolve a problem without first encountering them in the context? Young professionals, despite their passion and innovative mind, are at the short end of problem solving capability due to the lack of exposure to the perils and pitfalls. It would be arbitrary to expect an intern to handle the system breakdown on their first day at work. Nevertheless, with series of errors familiarization and adaptation, an expert could be born.
On the other hand, I concede that freshman, occasionally, is capable of providing constructive and innovative ideas as they cater a fresh set of eyes on the matter. Admittedly, experts are sometimes blinded or constrained by the large pool of knowledge while beginners are blessed with such ignorance. For instance, students are encouraged to scavenge creative ideas, which are then refined and realized with the help of experts, whether being the lecturers or researchers of the field. In this particular case, momentous output is rarely derived from the beginner’s try. Instead, it is the product of collaborative effort from both the beginner and the experts as those thoughts are nurtured by experience to be applicable in the real world.
In summary, as I cogently argue above, experts are an indispensable group of individuals, whose value should be appreciated rather than beginners.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, thus, while, for instance, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2333.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 424.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50235849057 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21747820954 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594339622642 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 725.4 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5724067485 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 122.789473684 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3157894737 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52631578947 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129555146574 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337070664479 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030702800059 0.0758088955206 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0657666764668 0.150359130593 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029913047088 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.38706741573 123% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 100.480337079 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.