Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Mother nature has bestowed human with a diverse ecosystem where abundant species have contributed to the vivid growth of all organism. However, with the booming of population, it comes with overexploitation on rustic woods, pollution to aero zones and oceanographic contamination. Not only does the goodwill to preserve wildlife and remaining ecoregion help reviving wildlife but also contribute to a balanced ecosystem for human race. Let’s examine the issue from 3 main spectrums of life including biological, economic and social respects.
Currently, there are more than 180 biodiversity hotspots worldwide that hosts hundreds of thousands endemic species either to the region or the global collection. The conspicuous rationale to secure the continuous breeding of these organisms is inferred from its irreplaceable function to the environment. Let’s take a look in a real-life example. In the mountain of Southwest China, the exploitation from over-hunting threatened the lives of thousands of endangered species and agriculture have hindered the growth of woods. The decrease in natural landmass and wildlife population, accompanied with the reduce of microbes required to breakdown waste, results in water contamination, weather change, and exhaustion of natural resources. It is extremely palpable to enforce jurisdiction to retrieve and restore this balance purely from a biological point of view.
Considering the issue from an economic measure, human has been beneficiary from the natural supply of precious material as wood, metal and medical herbs. Securing a sustainable eco-zone means better and ever-lasting ingredient sources. In China, Timber, considered to be one of the most favorable and high-value wood material for construction, is now facing a deficiency in supply. Woe to the drive of shrinking woods land for economically viable projects such as building entertainment park and luxurious resorts, which at the end, harms the economy. Besides, prestigious species such as Ling Zhi fungus from woods, Gingseng from hillside and Nostoc Flagellum (Hair-vegetable) in arid soil, which locals used to rely on to generate income, are all now be in their ‘bottleneck’ of surviving the damage.
Social contribution of natural environment is not to be belittled as well. As metropolitan treats cinema and shopping mall as a retreat after a long day of work, interacting with nature, whether being fishing or foraging, might be the only entertainment for folks staying uphill or along the coast. Jeopardizing the ethereal peace is no different than depriving locals of their sole alacrity. Besides being the main source to nourish our body and soul, bio-rich fauna is sometimes a saving straw to fight against sickness. Despite of Western and Eastern culture, herbaceous remedy has played a big part to the medical field, which makes saving fauna in risk a priority worldwide. Especially, where modern medication is not available, locals reply heavily on plants and herbs as cure to diseases.
However, one may argue that implementing such policy would also incur some opportunity cost to investors, locals and national economy. Due to the ever-increasing tourism demand on feeling the nature, government sometime would be prone toward a more profitable model. As modern facilities being implanted on these ecoregions, it would bring job opportunity, foreign investment and business prospects to the area, which would otherwise never occur. Contrary to public believe, conservation endeavor could also engage an immense volume of labor and investment. It’s akin to switch from building energy-consumed monsters to more resource-efficient guests house and huts to accommodate the demand to explore wildlife.
Thus, there is no absolute equation to assure which strategy might bring more benefit. However, looking from a long term vision, preserving the remaining natural landmass is not an option if we would want to secure the present of fresh air, clean water and healthy food source years to come.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 359, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to revive' or 'revive'.
Suggestion: to revive; revive
...e wildlife and remaining ecoregion help reviving wildlife but also contribute to a balan...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 607, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...d wildlife population, accompanied with the reduce of microbes required to breakdown waste...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 348, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...zing the ethereal peace is no different than depriving locals of their sole alacrity...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, look, may, so, thus, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 90.0 58.6224719101 154% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3439.0 2235.4752809 154% => OK
No of words: 616.0 442.535393258 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58279220779 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98190197535 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13045231895 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 368.0 215.323595506 171% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597402597403 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 1078.2 704.065955056 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1615812298 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.821428571 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.39285714286 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140146033734 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0309843942261 0.0831039109588 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026629894746 0.0758088955206 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0653753741745 0.150359130593 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184587299459 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 48.8420337079 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.38706741573 123% => OK
difficult_words: 218.0 100.480337079 217% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.