Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The very first th
its wrong, but argument need further clarification. unclear consequences on what?
scientific research done with some clarity, clarity, discoveries and innovation are necessary
space missions, nuclear energy, need to back the researchers - hypothesi to discover something new
Blind followinf may backfire, resources used to support research and some that are not clear may end up wasting resou8rces maintain a uniformity such policy must be in place. Various org have spent money in developing products that may be harmful in future. Seed compaineds monsanto and syngenta gm crops
It sounds a perilous to think of funding a research whose consequences are unclear. But, on closer examination we would see that most researches are not bound to particular result.Therefore, we must understand what is the unclear consequences of a research. Are they always bad? If not, then should they not be supported by the government? These areas must be explored to understand the need and impact of any policy related to this matter.
Scientific researches are usually done by a methodological approach. Unlike in the past when falling of apple on Newton's head gave him the idea of gravity, the scientists now develop hypothesis, conduct evidence based research and then accept or reject the results. More than often the exact outcomes of these researches are accompanied by finding other results also. There are a plethora of examples from the past where discoveries were made accidentally. For example, take the case of Madame Curie, who is credited for discovering Radium. In more recent years the experiments by CERN to find elusive dark matter, the origin of universe are all which have unclear consequences, but these researches are supported nevertheless because of the possibility that they might find out something which could be beneficial.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 53, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Unclear
...ut argument need further clarification. unclear consequences on what? scientific rese...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Scientific
...cation. unclear consequences on what? scientific research done with some clarity, clarit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... clarity, discoveries and innovation are necessary space missions, nuclear energ...
^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...developing products that may be harmful in future. Seed compaineds monsanto and syngenta ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 181, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...ches are not bound to particular result.Therefore, we must understand what is the unclear...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 247, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...and what is the unclear consequences of a research. Are they always bad? If not, then shou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 127, Rule ID: GAVE_GIVE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'give'?
Suggestion: give
...t when falling of apple on Newtons head gave him the idea of gravity, the scientists...
^^^^
Line 8, column 363, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...re accompanied by finding other results also. There are a plethora of examples from ...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.243076923077 0.240241500013 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.190769230769 0.157235817809 121% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0892307692308 0.0880659088768 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0461538461538 0.0497285424764 93% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0246153846154 0.0444667217837 55% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0984615384615 0.12292977631 80% => OK
Participles: 0.0553846153846 0.0406280797675 136% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.00987553917 2.79330140395 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0246153846154 0.030933414821 80% => OK
Particles: 0.00615384615385 0.0016655270985 369% => OK
Determiners: 0.0892307692308 0.0997080785238 89% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0307692307692 0.0249443105267 123% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0307692307692 0.0148568991511 207% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1865.0 2732.02544248 68% => OK
No of words: 295.0 452.878318584 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.32203389831 6.0361032391 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.58838876751 90% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.379661016949 0.366273622748 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.325423728814 0.280924506359 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.240677966102 0.200843997647 120% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.159322033898 0.132149295362 121% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00987553917 2.79330140395 108% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 219.290929204 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.64406779661 0.48968727796 132% => OK
Word variations: 76.3201543736 55.4138127331 138% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6194690265 73% => OK
Sentence length: 19.6666666667 23.380412469 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.9321972374 59.4972553346 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.333333333 141.124799967 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 23.380412469 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.21349557522 153% => OK
Readability: 52.209039548 51.4728631049 101% => OK
Elegance: 1.51764705882 1.64882698954 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258277880949 0.391690518653 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0532252368494 0.123202303941 43% => Sentence sentence coherence is low.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.050762456078 0.077325440228 66% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.545290499239 0.547984918172 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.220082695279 0.149214159877 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943710036023 0.161403998019 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381593451775 0.0892212321368 43% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.110098526334 0.385218514788 29% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.139061816686 0.0692045440612 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116934386941 0.275328986314 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581336829797 0.0653680567796 89% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.4325221239 38% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 13.5995575221 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.