Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
scientific research requires alot of efforts. No one in this world, guarantees what the innovation's consequences will be, it can be a huge benefit for the society if succeed or it can fail miserably. innovation should never, as they are for benefits for all people in the world. government should always encourage new scientific discoveries because every great things required great efforts.
Reasearch is an area in which success is not guaranteed, it required alot of perseverence from scientists. if scientists are putting theirs efforts and just because they cannot guarantee it's consequences, the idea of not providing government funding's not valid. The inventor of bulb, thomas alva edison tries 1000 different ways before he successfully invented light bulb, which is a boon for human being. if not provided with necessary facilities, thomas alva edison might not be able to innovate bulb, which might result into the world in which people cannot see or read at night.
it totally depends upon humans to how to use the innovation. humans invented robots, to do all daily boring tasks. Since, robots are capable of learning anything humans would teach it, it can be possible that some of the humans might teach robots how to fight or how to use different weapons. robot are machines and they can be operated by other humans too. if some hacker hacks that robot and inserts a command to kill the humans, it can be possible that robots will start killing humans. Thus, it's humans who defines their use of the innovation. the inventor of RDX thought of using it as a way to create path between nations and unite all the nations, but it was used as a Bomb in a war. it's a perspective in which the usecase of the innovation depends.
In conclusion, scientific research are thought as a boon for the people, but it's always peoples mindset by which those innovations are used.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Scientific
scientific research requires alot of efforts. No o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Innovation
...ty if succeed or it can fail miserably. innovation should never, as they are for benefits ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Government
...r benefits for all people in the world. government should always encourage new scientific ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...d alot of perseverence from scientists. if scientists are putting theirs efforts a...
^^
Line 5, column 407, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... bulb, which is a boon for human being. if not provided with necessary facilities,...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ople cannot see or read at night. it totally depends upon humans to how to u...
^^
Line 9, column 62, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Humans
...on humans to how to use the innovation. humans invented robots, to do all daily boring...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 210, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...would teach it, it can be possible that some of the humans might teach robots how to fight ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 294, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Robot
... fight or how to use different weapons. robot are machines and they can be operated b...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 359, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ey can be operated by other humans too. if some hacker hacks that robot and insert...
^^
Line 9, column 549, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ho defines their use of the innovation. the inventor of RDX thought of using it as ...
^^^
Line 9, column 692, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Its
...ns, but it was used as a Bomb in a war. its a perspective in which the usecase of t...
^^^
Line 9, column 692, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ns, but it was used as a Bomb in a war. its a perspective in which the usecase of t...
^^^
Line 9, column 758, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the usecase of the innovation depends. In conclusion, scientific research are t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 320.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.909375 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6422628057 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.7479678068 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4117647059 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8235294118 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88235294118 5.21951772744 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 7.80617977528 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0964056974584 0.243740707755 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352217043855 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560875552465 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0743038276531 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631240157874 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.