Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In devel

Essay topics:

Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

The students choose the field of interest and take in-depth knowledge in college or university. Students get ready to build their profession in a particular interest area, so the university and college education should be proper. I am not agreeing with the statement that the government should offer college and university education free of charge to all students. There are reasons listing below in support of opinion.

First of all, the university and college have many expenses such as salary to staff, building maintenance, sports facilities, and examination arrangement and so on. The university fulfills expenses with students’ fees. Government has to bear all expenses of the university If they want to offer free of charge education at college level to all students. The government has already burdened with a lot of responsibilities which are basic and important such as medical expenses. The underprivileged population is totally depends on the government for their medical and basic school level education of their children. And the government has to grant great funds to university to keep up education level which is a difficult task. So the government should support to some talented students who cannot afford fees in spite of taking responsibility of all students.

Additionally, in the society all type of people live together some are from weak economic families and some are from rich families. The wealthy families can afford university and college level education of their children. To give benefits to such opulence group of society is not a good idea even this wealthy groups should help to other families who cannot afford the fees. One more important point is the benefits should be based on the talents. The education in private college and universities are higher than government institutions. There are talented students belongs to low economic families and they could not get admission in university. In this scenario the government should focus on such talent which diminishes due to lack of monetary support then focuses on all students.

Moreover, according to psychology human work hard if they have deprivation of something. The students get everything easily than they do not have value for it. Same as the government offers free university and college education the students’ do not have value for it and they do not take it seriously. The students have to be motivated as well as ready to face all challenges of life and in this time they learn a lot. The students can do part-time job to collect money for fees which teach them the value of education also.

Finally, the government should not offer college and university education free of charge to all students although, start different scholarship and funding programs to motivate the students for higher education.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...d college education should be proper. I am not agreeing with the statement that the government ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 525, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...which teach them the value of education also. Finally, the government should not ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, moreover, so, then, well, as to, such as, as well as, first of all, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 12.9106741573 217% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2374.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21758241758 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90655165221 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435164835165 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 758.7 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2455424684 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.9166666667 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9583333333 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298173991649 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098359474116 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872352263445 0.0758088955206 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19504122223 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663002797317 0.0667264976115 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.