Governments should offer free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Education is the backbone of any nation's development. It plays a huge role in carving quality students which will run and feed the nation. A good education is very vital for the nation to thrive and flourish. Now, this education requires resources to keep alive. Universities are an important source for giving out education but they require money to be able to afford it. Money creates a dilemma for students who are lacking it and still dreams of a good education. The nation's government has an important role to see to it that this problem does not stymie a person's wish to achieve knowledge. In the following few passages, I'd try to explain what the government's stance should be on this subject.
Donating out free university education to every student who has been admitted in the university would lead to a dearth of the nation's fund in a few years. Rather than trying to solve a problem, this will lead to an even bigger conundrum which could have detrimental effects on the nation. It would not be wise to underwrite every student who has been able to get admitted to the university because then people might find ways to get admission into the university just to avail the free education. These can be ways which might not be ethical and would have a negative effect on the nation. Rather, deciding the receptor of this scholarship based on the merit of the student would lead to both more hard work in order to get the scholarship which would result in more meritorious students and also will keep the nation's bank afloat. So, to sum it up scholarship based on merit should be the way the government should give out free education so as to champion malpractices.
Now, the importance and implication of giving free education are prodigious. For a country like India, a country with a population of around 1.3 billion, this scheme can bring out wonders. Even though the population of the country is around 1/7th of the world's population, the growth, and quality of life do not provide justice to it. A majority of the population falls under the minimum required income for a stable life. This leads to the snatching of some possible bright-minded students to not achieve their potential because of the survival barrier. If with the help of government, this barrier can be cleared out then the nation's development will definitely see a spike in its development because of a greater force of better minds. People who are not blessed with money should not be kept restricted by it. Government's aide to such people can be used to make someone's life and also make the country a better place.
Education is an extremely powerful tool which in the hands of a deserving person can lead to many innovations and development. Hindering this development because of pecuniary issues will be a huge waste of talent and will be deleterious to the nation. Being able to provide a free education would bring out many developments in every field.
Thus, the government offering a free university education to the ones who deserve and cannot afford it would lead to a very positive effect on the nation's development. It would help the development of the society and will be able to provide a person with a better future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
Education is the backbone of any nations development. It plays a huge role in ca...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 472, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...d still dreams of a good education. The nations government has an important role to see...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 560, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...to it that this problem does not stymie a persons wish to achieve knowledge. In the follo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 628, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
...owledge. In the following few passages, Id try to explain what the governments sta...
^^
Line 1, column 631, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Id) must be used with a third-person verb: 'tries'.
Suggestion: tries
...edge. In the following few passages, Id try to explain what the governments stance ...
^^^
Line 1, column 655, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ew passages, Id try to explain what the governments stance should be on this subject. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 941, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...vernment should give out free education so as to champion malpractices. Now, the im...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 255, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...n of the country is around 1/7th of the worlds population, the growth, and quality of ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 629, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...his barrier can be cleared out then the nations development will definitely see a spike...
^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 148, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...d lead to a very positive effect on the nations development. It would help the developm...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, then, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 12.4196629213 225% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2673.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 558.0 442.535393258 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79032258065 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86024933743 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70051467541 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426523297491 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 847.8 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0137464498 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.59259259259 5.21951772744 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272409447986 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080265981671 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104527389681 0.0758088955206 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166417246202 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931233068078 0.0667264976115 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.