Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
The topic of education is a hotly contested one. As a society we are still trying to find the right mix to provide the best education system possible. Among the many debates within education system, university education is an ubiquitous one, more specifically the accessibility of university education. The above statement suggests university education should be funded by the government in case of lack of availability of personal funds. While that may seem like a quixotic measure to take, given the many practical problem a Government is likely to face to undertake such a mammoth task, nevertheless I do believe that such should be the course of action for the government.
Education is among the basic needs for a human being, and it is also quintesential for a society to function properly. While many may feel such does not apply for university education, and as a matter of fact that may be true for many individual, but if an individual is capable and willing to undertake university education, then he or she should be given the opportunity to have university education. Financial constraint should not be a hindrance for this process. After all education should not be limited to just the priveledged few, as such will not just be unfair for a poorer student, but will also be detrimental for an university, as they will be deprived from a potentially talented individual who might have been a beacon for the university itself.
Detractors of the above statement will point to the practicality of such an undertaking. Afterall, university education is not cheap, and the number of students who cannot afford university education are not just a handful either, so naturally this is a financially taxing program to take for many governments. However, Scandanavian countries have shown that such undertakings are possible, and not only that, it can prove to be highly beneficial for the country as a whole as well. As greater accessibility to education leads to more educated public which eventually leads to a more financially sound government. Many may argue that Scandanavian countries are rich to begin with, so they can afford such undertaking, however such is not true. Even Bangladesh, a third world country provides government subsidised public university. So if a government can balance the budget, university education can be provided to those who cannot afford it.
Overall, providing free university education can be a difficult task, but Scandanvian countries have provided tuition free university education and even Bangladesh can afford to subsidise university education, so it proves that given enough will, such undertakings are possible. And in the long run the cost will eventually be covered as the country will be awarded with more talented citizens, who could have been lost from our radar just beacuse of his inability to finance his education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... of education is a hotly contested one. As a society we are still trying to find t...
^^
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ucation system, university education is an ubiquitous one, more specifically the a...
^^
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., more specifically the accessibility of university education. The above statemen...
^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: much may; a good deal of may
...r a society to function properly. While many may feel such does not apply for university...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 627, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...udent, but will also be detrimental for an university, as they will be deprived fr...
^^
Line 9, column 90, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: After all
...he practicality of such an undertaking. Afterall, university education is not cheap, and...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 484, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ial for the country as a whole as well. As greater accessibility to education lead...
^^
Line 9, column 615, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: Much may; A good deal of may
...to a more financially sound government. Many may argue that Scandanavian countries are r...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, then, third, well, while, after all, as a matter of fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 12.9106741573 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2426.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 468.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18376068376 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0311672395 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465811965812 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 804.6 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.9962962048 60.3974514979 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.777777778 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293935851262 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102849471621 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972453547564 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199691674567 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327795565653 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.