Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take

Essay topics:

Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.

Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

Most of us have heard of this sentiment: “The rich are getting richer, the poor are becoming poorer!”. Some of us have even experienced or observed this fact. While some people may argue this to be untrue, it is unfortunate that it has become the reality of our global society. The rich people having endless means and resources at their disposal are flourishing in every sector – be it politics, education, business, entertainment - as a result. The poor on the other hand, are struggling to get through everyday hurdles such as acquiring meals, providing shelter to their families and sending their kids to school.

For a society or nation, and the world in general, it is crucial that the balance between the rich and poor segments of the society be maintained in order to achieve economic stability and growth. Education is the most effective means by which this balance can be restored. And what better way to utilise the taxpayers’ money than to invest in the education of the students that wish to educate themselves but cannot afford to do so. The students that manage to receive an acceptance from universities are clearly capable as well as promising and given the opportunity, can achieve great heights and fulfilling careers.

Apart from direct benefits, there are some indirect benefits to supporting this endeavour. When the poor section of the society cannot afford necessities like education, they get discouraged and sometimes even acerbic towards others. They might be tempted to partake in illegal activities and may also develop criminal tendencies. It is a sad reality that a lot of children become victims of child labour and human trafficking, as their guardians are entrenched in the belief that there is no future after education. Free tuition to students may prove to be a factor that encourages the neglected section of our society to put in conscious efforts to gain education, and eventually alleviate themselves from poverty. These students will have an equal opportunity to the best education and may become the scientists, businessmen and leaders of tomorrow.

First world nations or developed nations should be able to provide free tuition to the deprived students with relatively lesser difficulty than those nations that cannot afford to do so. In such a scenario, the governments may provide free tuition and later recover full or partial sum of the monetary value when the students are in a better position to support themselves. A little foresight and deliberate efforts can go a long way in the improvement of quality of life of a country’s residents and contribute to economic and social growth.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, well, while, apart from, in general, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2240.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 435.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14942528736 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86609069008 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531034482759 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8422044255 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.444444444 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108305515557 0.243740707755 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0317318627585 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374432285678 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0698510550492 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466530968498 0.0667264976115 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.