Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Education is something that helps a person to become disciplined in life and make them learn to respect others. The author’s assertion to provide free education to the students who cannot afford to pay the tuition fees can be a good initiative but it is not ideal for every situation. With the help of some examples, I would like to prove my point on this issue.
It is although a good initiative to sponsor the fees for the people in need. But there is need for some additional checks that should be considered for providing the aid. As government will be spending a myriad sum of money it cannot be wasted for the students who are not willing to study and are forced by their parents or peers to study. To check the people for aid, there earlier achievements can be looked in the field they are planning to study further. Also, the aid for the following years should be provided to the students based on their performances in the different examinations being conducted by the university.
The university should also do a strong background check of every student who is planning to take the benefit by the government. A robust check is must to make sure that no one is concealing truth and are trying to take the benefits that is meant for others. The university should prepare a list of necessary documents that is needed to be shown by every candidate applying for receiving the benefit. The university should go through the list to check for the validity of documents submitted by the candidates.
In the conclusion, I would just like to add that an initiative like this by the government is very helpful for the people who’s parents are doing painstaking hard-work to make their children’s successful in life and to become self-dependent. In the mean-time it is necessary to make sure that the eligible candidates gets the benefit and advantage of these type of schemes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...it by the government. A robust check is must to make sure that no one is concealing tru...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 329.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77507598784 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82924359533 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489361702128 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3683560706 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.214285714 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.64285714286 5.21951772744 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18982604609 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711716871448 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579684996401 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114784600303 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044538701846 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.