Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Offering a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition would be a great step of Government. This step will definatly show its impact on its countrys well being. So Government should provide tuition to those university student who ca not afford the tuition.
Firstly, by providing tuition to one student it opens so many doors to opportunity which will eventually come in hand to the country peoples development. Students can go on with their recharch in their passonate field. They will be able to make things or give theories to overcome so many problems. Without funding they would have never be able to place their mark in certain field ever.
Also the world is going fast. To keep pace with others, it is necessary to educate the young generation latest. But many talented student would be lost in this run because of their inability to afford the university tuition. With funding from Government they would be able to contribute to the country.
Though providing university tuition has its upside it may show some downsides too. Funding an undeserving student would cause a great loss to the country. It would certainly go in vain if the student do not utilize this consideration. Also many would misuse this tuition to building harmful devices or providing dangerous theories. But this can overcome by testing the students will to do well for country, before providing the university tuition.
In the end I would strongly agree that Government should provide tuition to those who cannot affort their university tuition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 271, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this university' or 'those universities'?
Suggestion: this university; those universities
...So Government should provide tuition to those university student who ca not afford the tuition. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 134, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... eventually come in hand to the country peoples development. Students can go on with th...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 338, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
.... Without funding they would have never be able to place their mark in certain fie...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...e their mark in certain field ever. Also the world is going fast. To keep pace w...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e able to contribute to the country. Though providing university tuition has its up...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 236, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...dent do not utilize this consideration. Also many would misuse this tuition to build...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 2235.4752809 60% => OK
No of words: 266.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05639097744 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62929277709 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 215.323595506 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515037593985 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 704.065955056 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5782106998 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.1176470588 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6470588235 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.58823529412 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244433992662 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885358992102 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119605370389 0.0758088955206 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169714692205 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123775316823 0.0667264976115 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 100.480337079 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.