Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who can not afford the tuition.
Education is a right that everyone in a democratic country should possess. The assertion that government should offer education no matter whether an individual is able to afford will sure confirm this right to its people. Despite there are plenty of obstacles and side effects during implementing this policy, it is still worth doing.
First of all, if government will pay for individuals tuition fee for college level education, the overall education level will increase, therefore the country will get massive benefits from it. If everyone is offered a chance to enter university, then people will not jump into labor market after high school education, instead, the knowledge they gain in college will largely improve their professional skills, thus the country’s general work force will be at a high skill level. What’s more, higher education will bring about the faster development of technology, the incoming future is not a labor competitive world, instead, it is the technology achievement that drive the country thriving, in this case, providing free university is an imperative investment.
Secondly, the reason behind one student’s lack of financial supports is the poverty of a whole family and a lack of awareness of the importance of education. Parents who do not have enough saving to support their child’s college tend to educate their child to get a job as soon as finishing high school, then they are more likely to build their own family in the early age and still living at a low socioeconomic status, thus the problem continues persisting. However, if the government eliminated the concern for high price of university education, people under pressure of poverty will receive high level education and more likely secure a job with better pay and improve their family’s financial situation, also they will realize the importance of education, and will be able to and willing to financially support their child to enter college. Gradually, the burden for the government of free education will be less due to the growing financial and education status of its people.
However, there are concerns that whether the government is able to provide such huge of money in supporting this policy when there are many other field requires money badly, admittedly, Other areas like health care and environment protection might will not receive as much support as education due to limited resource. Still the benefits of investing on free education outweighs its disadvantage. For example, it would be wise to educate people about the importance of protect environment, also improving clear energy technology in college research, to helping solving the environment problem we are facing, rather than letting people not realize the problems while government spending huge amount of resource to correcting it. Free education will sure improve the efficiency of conquer problems in other areas.
In a word, the assertion that government should provide free university education is reasonable, for it will bring invaluable outcomes, such as the improvements of people’s education level, financial status, even other areas will also be benefited from it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 147, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'fields'?
Suggestion: fields
...g this policy when there are many other field requires money badly, admittedly, Other...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 319, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...t as education due to limited resource. Still the benefits of investing on free educa...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 561, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to solve' or 'solve'.
Suggestion: to solve; solve
...hnology in college research, to helping solving the environment problem we are facing, ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 38.0 12.9106741573 294% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2696.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 502.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37051792829 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86844012709 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490039840637 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 860.4 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.370481857 60.3974514979 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 179.733333333 118.986275619 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4666666667 23.4991977007 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 5.21951772744 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173453848931 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071341259191 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450562136549 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112637175489 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296674293496 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 14.1392134831 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 48.8420337079 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 12.1743820225 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.46 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.