Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
This topic raises a cotroversial issue whether, the government should place any restrictions on the scientific research and development. Indisputably, there are many issues where the obstructions are necessary for the betterment of the society. Nevertheless, inventions are mostly the results that are unexpected and are achieved because of the theoretical misconceptions that are done mistakenly while carrying out the experiment. Thus, I would disagree with the contention that the Government should impose restriction on the scientific research and development and would agree that the research and development work should be done withount any obstruction.
Firstly, there are many researches and innovations that are being carried out in this century of knowledge. The innovations are generally the result of the works carried out somewhat differently than what was expected during the hypothesis. Now, if these projects are restricted than the overall development of the Nation will be hindered and the progress of the nation might get affected on a large scale. To illustrate, let us take an example where there is multinational company working on a project of making the washing powder for the clothes. However, if the project is restrained by the government than the company might fail and this might result into loss of jobs of many people. Hence, there should not be restriction on the scientific research and development.
Secondly, due to the restriction there is block on the increment of the people. As we know, that there is something new being innovated every minute of the clock and thus if the Government of any one nation decides to resist the innovative project work than the skill power of that Nation will decrease greatly and as a result the Nation will start to deteriorate. So, in order to rebuild the Nation back on it's feet it is very necessary that the research and development project works continue without any obstruction. Also, this will help in making the Nation dexterous and competent with the other Nations of the world.
Admittedly, there are some innovations which if does not occur are good for the betterment of the human society. There is an example such as research in the nuclear field should be refrained in order to to achieve peaceful and oppurtunistic environment. But, if the research in the nuclear field are done so that to achieve the energy in the form of electricity or mechanical power than there should be no issue with such a research project. Therefore, there might be some projects that should be restricted to some level. But, on the major scale scientific research and development projects should not be hindered.
To sum up, the contention of the author is indefensible that the Government should place some restrictions on the research and development field is indefensible. This contention is contrary to the overwhelming evidence that the scientific projects should not be obstructed. Thus, as long as some measurements are performed, or some areas are involved the conclusion that the Government should not hinder the research and development projects holds credit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 46, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...tedly, there are some innovations which if does not occur are good for the betterm...
^^
Line 4, column 201, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...lear field should be refrained in order to to achieve peaceful and oppurtunistic envi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 457, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and development projects holds credit.
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'such as', 'as a result', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.227106227106 0.240241500013 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.159340659341 0.157235817809 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0622710622711 0.0880659088768 71% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0494505494505 0.0497285424764 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00915750915751 0.0444667217837 21% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.124542124542 0.12292977631 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0421245421245 0.0406280797675 104% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.99336249748 2.79330140395 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0201465201465 0.030933414821 65% => OK
Particles: 0.00732600732601 0.0016655270985 440% => OK
Determiners: 0.150183150183 0.0997080785238 151% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0384615384615 0.0249443105267 154% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.014652014652 0.0148568991511 99% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3140.0 2732.02544248 115% => OK
No of words: 504.0 452.878318584 111% => OK
Chars per words: 6.23015873016 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.58838876751 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.365079365079 0.366273622748 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.289682539683 0.280924506359 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.234126984127 0.200843997647 117% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.15873015873 0.132149295362 120% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99336249748 2.79330140395 107% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 219.290929204 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.412698412698 0.48968727796 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.7923897312 55.4138127331 84% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.9090909091 23.380412469 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7152428527 59.4972553346 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.727272727 141.124799967 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9090909091 23.380412469 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.772727272727 0.674092028746 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 51.8773448773 51.4728631049 101% => OK
Elegance: 1.80672268908 1.64882698954 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396802383663 0.391690518653 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.162250600179 0.123202303941 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0867965350503 0.077325440228 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.615277356746 0.547984918172 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.131852889257 0.149214159877 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19776662626 0.161403998019 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729943773065 0.0892212321368 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.558025024504 0.385218514788 145% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0786926238222 0.0692045440612 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304851428143 0.275328986314 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227912208061 0.0653680567796 35% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.4325221239 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88274336283 184% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.66592920354 191% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.70907079646 258% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.5995575221 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.