The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The topic raises a controversial issue whether, the correct way of teaching is to praise the positive actions and to ignore the negative ones. Indisputedly, the positvie action of a student must be applauded in order to increase his confidence and advent in a positive pathway. Nevertheless, his negative points at the same time are not to be ignored. Thus, I generally disagree with the conted that the positive actions of the students are lauded and the negative ones are to condoned.
Firstly, the negative action of a child sometimes are unwitting and if, the child is guided in the correct path it might be possible that the child turns into a pervert. To illustrate this further, let us take the example of Mahatma Gandhi, when he was a child he used to lie a lot. Further more, he was also involved in larceny, if he wouldn't have been guided in the right path than it is assumable that he might have turned into some other person and the Gandhi we know.
Secondly, let us presume, that the negative acts of a child are being done intentionally even then, if they are ignored than as a student, the person will likely to inspire from it and repeats it, again and again till it spoils him. In such condition, who is to be blamed? The child or the person who didn't occluded him from committing such negative acts. To illustrate it, let's take an example of a mother and a child. Though, however erratic the child might be, the mother always tries to teach him the rudimenteries by tit or tat.
Also, it is sometimes advised to let go the fallacies of the child in order that, he does not lose his confidence due to constant poor performance in certain tasks. For example, if the child is appearing for an ellocution for the very first time and if he does a mistake or, gets stuck in between than his negative points are not remarked generally. On the contrary, he is appreciated for the attempt which gives him confidence for the future attempts.
Thus, to conclude the contention of the author is indefensible that only the positive aspects are to praised and the negative ones are to be ignored. This contention is contrary to the overwhelming evidence that the negative points of the child must also be remarked at the same time. Thus, as long as some measurements are performed, or some areas are involved the suggestion that the negative actions are a child should also be remarked holds credit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 337, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... he was also involved in larceny, if he wouldnt have been guided in the right path than...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... be blamed? The child or the person who didnt occluded him from committing such negat...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 192, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ertain tasks. For example, if the child is appearing for an ellocution for the very first ti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d should also be remarked holds credit.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'for example', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.173361522199 0.240241500013 72% => OK
Verbs: 0.196617336152 0.157235817809 125% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0803382663848 0.0880659088768 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0634249471459 0.0497285424764 128% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0591966173362 0.0444667217837 133% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.112050739958 0.12292977631 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0549682875264 0.0406280797675 135% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61200323935 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0359408033827 0.030933414821 116% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.128964059197 0.0997080785238 129% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.014799154334 0.0249443105267 59% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0105708245243 0.0148568991511 71% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2410.0 2732.02544248 88% => OK
No of words: 428.0 452.878318584 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6308411215 6.0361032391 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.306074766355 0.366273622748 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.240654205607 0.280924506359 86% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.177570093458 0.200843997647 88% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0817757009346 0.132149295362 62% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61200323935 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 219.290929204 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467289719626 0.48968727796 95% => OK
Word variations: 51.2252301216 55.4138127331 92% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.7777777778 23.380412469 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9087352534 59.4972553346 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.888888889 141.124799967 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 23.380412469 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.722222222222 0.674092028746 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 47.8431983385 51.4728631049 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.06622516556 1.64882698954 65% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464874556988 0.391690518653 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.159318481344 0.123202303941 129% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0860681898749 0.077325440228 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.619854892841 0.547984918172 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.138280779905 0.149214159877 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.225112644014 0.161403998019 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933448058986 0.0892212321368 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.390930887145 0.385218514788 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0216216409191 0.0692045440612 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.341950281921 0.275328986314 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738832635053 0.0653680567796 113% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.4325221239 38% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.30420353982 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 7.22455752212 42% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 3.66592920354 218% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.