Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Science changed our life and makes it more comfortable and easy. Today science decrease distance between people with its mesmerizing technologies of transportation and communication. Technologies increase speed of development of every country but coin has two sides and some researches become dangerous for the human life. The government should put restrictions of the researches and development of technology which can destroy human life. I am listing some examples to support my opinion about restrictions on scientific researches.
Firstly, the science research in every field and nuclear energy is one of the researches which should be prohibited. No one can forget the Second World War which destroys Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Even today the generations grow with deformities due to nuclear bomb explosion. Nuclear energy, bomb, weapons, and other explosive material is developing which is not good for our society. The attack on World Trade Center is also one of the examples which force us to restrict some researches. There are so many examples which prove that the development of weapons and explosive material should be prohibited. The 26/11 attack on Shivaji Terminal was shocking and horrible and no one can forget it lifelong. Although these incidence rise questions on the researches of science.
Even today the food we eat is also not safe because of technologies. The researches of food technology make artificial food flavors and preservative to save food item for long time. It is dangerous for body because the chemicals used in the food are negatively affecting our body cells. There are a different type of chemicals are available in market for rapid growth of fruits and vegetables but these chemicals decrease immunity of human body. These type of researches never help to us and that's why I am not in favor of it.
Research is already underway for cloning animals, but there are strong chances about the results of similar experiments on humans. If the cloning get successful then the people get its disadvantage and use it for their own revenges. Today scientists are working on artificial intelligence which work alike human cognition. The robots take place of people engaged at menial work which is okay but as scientist are trying to work on emotions of robots. The governments should take care of the society from such researches because it may destruct the society.
Finally, the government should mind the benefits of society and restrict such researches and technologies which can cause the difficulties to all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | pratysinha | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | asdfjmn | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | muthukrishna | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Persian Moonlight | 16 | view |
- The following is a letter to the head of the tourism bureau on the island of Tria."Erosion of beach sand along the shores of Tria Island is a serious threat to our island and our tourist industry. In order to stop the erosion, we should charge people 43
- Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall stu 23
- The following report appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council."An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby East 72
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing."During the past year, Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant, where the work shifts are one hour shorter 23
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television has destroyed communication among friends and family Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 704, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ible and no one can forget it lifelong. Although these incidence rise questions on the r...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 713, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this incidence' or 'these incidences'?
Suggestion: this incidence; these incidences
...no one can forget it lifelong. Although these incidence rise questions on the researches of sci...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 493, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...type of researches never help to us and thats why I am not in favor of it. Researc...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2145.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24449877751 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88946664999 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511002444988 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.3331906389 60.3974514979 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.375 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0416666667 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54166666667 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193025713762 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554787150566 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449064607989 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113672741235 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372730449674 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.