Development of the country is closely related with the scientific activities and researches carried by the scientists. Since the modern world prioritizes the competition between the parties, governments should be able to improve the scientific activities in order to be able to develop. However, restrictions on the scientific activities would lead scientists to feel vanquished because it destroys creativity. I will explore the reasons in the following essay.
There is an argument who positions itself on the opposing side. Some of the people suggests that government should control scientific activities because of safety problems. In other words, research and development processes may result in dramatic results that leads the countries to be frustrated. This argument is formed by considering power of the knowledge and unreversible results of the science. Nuclear bomb is pervasively given as an example for supporting this argument. If the government tried to control such an destroying invention, millions of people hadn’t died at Japan during world war 2.
However, although there may be harmful results of such a creative thinking, there is also beneficial consequences of science implemented to the modern world. In other words, unpredicted results of the scientific thinking shouldn’t be only concern for decision makers while they are critising the value of research activities. Instead, benefits of them should be prioritized for the process of the evaluating their effects to the modern life. For instance, if the quantum physicians didn’t put effort for such byzantine researches related to the quantum physics, there wouldn’t be modern inventions such as radio or television since they are created by using wave theory. As a result, if the government had tried to regulate the activities related to the atomic science by just considering the negative results of them, there wouldn’t be technological invetions pervasively used.
Last but not least, regulating science costs a lot to the governments in terms of human resources and lack of competition skills. Since regulation means constraining the scientist or forcing them to think in a way that the government wants, perseverance of the researchers are dramatically decreased under governmental regulations, which leads them to leave the country. As it mentioned above, without high skilled scientists, countries would be in a miserable position while they are competing with other countries. For example, brain drain that the countries which have otocratic leaders have faced so far makes them less wealthy.
In conclusion, the idea of regulating scientific activity is meaningless. Trying to control scientists kills the creativity that they need to be sustain for their activities. Governments should consider positive effects of the scientific activities and provide freedom for future thinkers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 65, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
... positions itself on the opposing side. Some of the people suggests that government should ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 520, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...If the government tried to control such an destroying invention, millions of peopl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2451.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60869565217 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06975801513 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530892448513 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 730.8 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.9226071219 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.409090909 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8636363636 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19736422917 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616136120556 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642355367673 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127983934138 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067394700661 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.1639044944 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.