Some people strongly believe that the greatness of individuals can be hardly gain their respect by their comtemporaries. While someaspect of the argument maybe agreeable, the society, circumstances are slowly changing so it needs an reframing of words.
In the history it is naturally evident that many historian, philosophars, legends where never appreciated by their contepraries. People like Socrates who as killed by his own people considering his ideas as piosoneous, he was neither respected nor appreciated by his contemprories only unit recent times. Galileo Galili who is now consider as legend for his discover of telescope and arguing that the earth is spherical was critisised, his theories were considered canard. Untill recent when scientist accepted his ideas. To continue on numeral people have died without the honour they deserve.
However there are situations in history where the latter idea in disproved and pople are hailed for their work by their fellow members. For example, Stephan Hawkins a true physicist, astronomer, a pious person who made wonderful contribution. Mahathma Gandhi a austere leader, who fought for millions freedom was and is an apothosis for his people. With these facts we can see that there both the situations possible.
One of the reson why people fail to appreciate fellowmans work maybe due to nature tendency to human to recognise the value of things only when its lost. Another hypothesis maybe during the period of Galileo or socrates people never thought beyond a fixed limit. But today the scenerio is whole different due to the awhile ability of technology its easy gather news and knowlege within seconds. This has broadened the capablity of mans imagination. also the standard of comepetition today is much sever when compared for to the predescers so it is more obvious that the dead will ever compete with the living.
To summarise due to the advent of technology it difficult for someone talented to die without being know. In an age where news is updated synchronously, knowledge is omnipresent, the standard of competition to too intense to compare to the people like Galileo even though they never had these facilities. So summarizing in today's world people are compared with their fellow workers rather than the deceased.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...stances are slowly changing so it needs an reframing of words. In the history it ...
^^
Line 2, column 45, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun historian seems to be countable; consider using: 'many historians'.
Suggestion: many historians
...he history it is naturally evident that many historian, philosophars, legends where never appr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 331, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
...recent times. Galileo Galili who is now consider as legend for his discover of telescope...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... died without the honour they deserve. However there are situations in history where t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...wonderful contribution. Mahathma Gandhi a austere leader, who fought for millions...
^
Line 4, column 449, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...ened the capablity of mans imagination. also the standard of comepetition today is m...
^^^^
Line 4, column 449, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: also,
...ened the capablity of mans imagination. also the standard of comepetition today is m...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, second, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 368.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22826086957 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83816399424 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60597826087 0.4932671777 123% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9480965193 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.263157895 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3684210526 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.10526315789 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105664762208 0.243740707755 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0326955482618 0.0831039109588 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353647572218 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0642964347553 0.150359130593 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337408815059 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.