The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
Given notion is although correct in some situations, but it is not the case which is always true. We can estimate greatness of personalities, only when we are able correctly construe their deeds. This understanding process, sometime takes years; therefore, there are some cases, where greatness of some people is praised posthumously.
Galileo, the famous philosopher, disabused some commonly followed conventions of catholic church. People of his times were not able to recognize his ideas, because they found them impossible according to their believes at that times. After some centuries, when scientists expressed consensus with Galileo's idea, Galileo's greatness was confirmed by the world. We can see that this case reasonably supports the given notion.
However, if contemporary people are knowledgeable enough to admire, to understand the greatness of someone, the case is completely different. For example, when Archimedes formulated the buoyancy principle, his king reward him for his success. King was cognizant of what actually he (Archimedes) had done; this made him to recognize the greatness of this early scientist.
Now days, we have enough facilities like patents, publications , conferences, manifestos etc.; this makes anyone of us to easily present his or her ideas. Therefore, with these facilities new generation is less likely to conform the given notion. For example, we can evaluate a politician on basis of her work records and manifestos. Similarly, a sports person can be judged on grounds of her performance in concerned sports; her games could be easily viewed on television, and we can then decide her greatness on basis of her game play.
Thus, we can see that given notion is rarely having any significance in present world. Though, this notion was true in some earlier times, when there was a severe deficit of intellectual skills, like for example, at times of Galileo. But now time has drastically changed; now people are having enough knowledge to assess; to wisely decide ones worthiness; to determine the virtue of one's greatness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beliefs' (noun) instead of believes (verb)?
Suggestion: beliefs
...ound them impossible according to their believes at that times. After some centuries, wh...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...greatness of this early scientist. Now days, we have enough facilities like...
^^^
Line 9, column 63, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...gh facilities like patents, publications , conferences, manifestos etc.; this make...
^^
Line 9, column 348, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...rk records and manifestos. Similarly, a sports person can be judged on grounds of her ...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 340, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...h knowledge to assess; to wisely decide ones worthiness; to determine the virtue of ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 384, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... worthiness; to determine the virtue of ones greatness.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, similarly, so, then, therefore, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 326.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4018404908 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9116361964 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58282208589 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3632136132 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.588235294 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52941176471 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143196356388 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428688851695 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477337654806 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0774494209311 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325211850135 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.