The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
An individual gain greatness due to his hard work and talent. There should be a touch stone to define the greatness of any individual so, greatness should be decided with respect to its contemporaries. There are so many examples which prove that people become great when they compare with their fellows. The people who are live after great one not matched with the touchstone, so they don't have much contribution in other achievements.
First and foremost, example related to my position in given issue statement is from Indian history. There are so many leaders who fought for freedom struggle from Britisher's rule and all of them worked hard, but there was a great leader who is still remembered at international level named Mahatma Gandhi. He is memorized because of his uniqueness among his compeers. Other than Mahatma Gandhi all worked for society where as he worked differently on the basis of his principles. The greatness of Mahatma Gandhi had recognized only because of his fellow leaders.
Second example is from classroom where teacher teach every child equally and pay attention to all. yet, one or two become extraordinary among all students. Again, the comparison held with contemporaries. If we saw the people who left behind than we can see only the qualities of individual but, when we compare with contemporaries then we find that individual is actually great. As I had read in religious books that the comparison should be held among equal things than only the results will pure and reliable.
Thirdly, there are so many women writers who wrote for feminism and criticized by society, but they have foretelling ability that's why they wrote before feminism come in picture. The famous women writer Mary Wollstonecraft famous example. she wrote 'Vindication for women' Which is criticized by fellow people but later on it become reality and helps to women for fought for feminism. When the peers or contemporaries starts denouncing then it became clear there is something special or unique. There is one more example of famous scientist named Galileo who spoke against dogmatic thinking of Christians and due to which he gets blasphemy by pop. After some centuries, when scientists expressed consensus with Galileo's idea, Galileo's greatness was confirmed by the world. so, this example also supports to the position that the contemporaries helps to find greatness in an individual.
Finally, on the basis of aforementioned examples we can say that the greatness of an individual is decided by his contemporaries or we can say fellow. They either helps to find uniqueness of individual or their criticism helps to saw greatness of an individual.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ot matched with the touchstone, so they dont have much contribution in other achieve...
^^^^
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...n Mahatma Gandhi all worked for society where as he worked differently on the basis of h...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Yet
...child equally and pay attention to all. yet, one or two become extraordinary among ...
^^^
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...iety, but they have foretelling ability thats why they wrote before feminism come in ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...ter Mary Wollstonecraft famous example. she wrote Vindication for women Which is cr...
^^^
Line 7, column 772, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...s greatness was confirmed by the world. so, this example also supports to the posi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, if, second, so, still, then, third, thirdly, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2237.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 436.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13073394495 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85311052509 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 698.4 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2382995951 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2608695652 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9565217391 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21739130435 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208805800415 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580867524674 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430880577635 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120118074333 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443403058692 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.