Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Attending a live performance (for example, a play, concert, or sporting event) is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Enjoying live performances and watching on the internet or television are totally different experiences. Doing something with more than two sense organs is really memorable and it happens in live performances so I agree with the statement that attending a live performance is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television. There are several more reasons behind my opinion which strengthen it.
First, there are lots of people in a concert and everyone cheers with a loud voice which fills the space with energy. The energy automatically increases the enjoyment in comparison to watching alone on live or repeat telecasts on the internet. For instance, when we watch musical nights in any club is more appealing because we can dance with friends but at home we can not have the same fun as we had in live performance.
Second, the live performances are non edited and we can see the whole show but the internet and tv programs are edited. To maintain the flow of the show and to make it short usually people cut the repeated scenes and less laughter blowing scenes. The beauty and art can only be seen in live performance with spontaneous actions. For example, there are many uncut scenes available on the internet of live performance programmed. If we want to see edited and scripted tap then we can watch movies or other television programs.
Third, there are other things also which we can enjoy with the actual event which make it more interesting. For example, I had attended a play on mental health and there are different stalls also present outside the theater. The graduate students in those stalls were doing mental health exercises with people and that was really amazing. In contrast there is nothing to enjoy other than online programs on television or the internet.
Finally, on the basis of above mentioned examples and reasons we can conclude that watching a live performance mesmerizes us more than watching it on television or internet. One more thing is to clearly understand that live performances are totally different than watching it on television.
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station."To reverse a decline in listener numbers, our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock-music format. The decline has occurred despite population gro42
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of Parson City's local newspaper."In our region of Trillura, the majority of money spent on the schools that most students attend—the city-run public schools—comes from taxes that each city go73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television newspapers magazines and other media pay too much attention to the personal lives of famous people such as public figures and celebrities Use specific reasons and details to explain your opi71
- When people succeed it is because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with success Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position80
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 406, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
... behind my opinion which strengthen it. First, there are lots of people in a con...
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...yment in comparison to watching alone on live or repeat telecasts on the internet...
Line 7, column 343, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
... people and that was really amazing. In contrast there is nothing to enjoy other than on...
Line 9, column 260, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
...live performances are totally different than watching it on television.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, really, second, so, then, third, for example, for instance, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98571428571 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71068784102 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488571428571 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8991559373 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.647058824 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5882352941 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345715034849 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112389248242 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874851154735 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212164663756 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111209759528 0.0645574589148 172% => OK
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.