Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
There are so many heroes in our society, some become famous when they elapsed from life and some get famous when they are alive. Today we all live in digital era and media plays a vital role in our life. It is true that media builds heroes from our society as well as diminished one’s reputation in few seconds. I am agreeing, to a great extent of the conviction that media scrutinize the heroes from society. In the following paragraphs, some convincing reasons will be delineated to elaborate my personal stance.
Moreover, for a small incidence media prepare a huge coverage and present in a juicy story. For example, during elections in democratic countries media become energetic and disclose records of political leaders in a dramatic way. Media is attentive about leaders’ action as well as words. So, the medias scrutiny will eventually diminish the reputation of malefactors which is important for a society to grow in positive direction.
Furthermore, as media disclose the misdeed of political leaders similarly media highlights hidden talent of common people and make them hero. For example, a girl without hands can make beautiful paintings with legs gets success from media. We started recognizing Manjhi who is a common man lived in small village of India fight for connectivity for his village from nearest town. He broke a mountain with hands to connect the village and become famous only because of media. Media spotlight such talented people and make them heroes of the society.
Additionally, media is free from pressure of any group or government. Whereas in society people live with their dogma and want to promote their own group. Due to impartial nature of media it promotes everyone who has talent as well as slander the persons who did wrong. Media is based on facts and that is one of the major reasons that media plays major role than a society can do to build heroes.
Conclusively, media serves to both glorifies individuals for their noble and diminish the reputation who malpractice in society. so, the claim is true media play important role than society to highlights living man and woman as heroes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 320, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...one's reputation in few seconds. I am agreeing, to a great extent of the conviction th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a dramatic way" with adverb for "dramatic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...d disclose records of political leaders in a dramatic way. Media is attentive about leaders'...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'from the nearest'.
Suggestion: from the nearest
... fight for connectivity for his village from nearest town. He broke a mountain with hands to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 130, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
... reputation who malpractice in society. so, the claim is true media play important...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, second, similarly, so, well, whereas, for example, as well as, it is true, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 359.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00557103064 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64704283366 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534818941504 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.9299017246 60.3974514979 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.85 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.95 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240918074109 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765860308302 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503197050246 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142742147887 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303299054592 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.