The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries
<p class="p1"><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> </span>This topic argues that the judgement of a life of a person would be determined only by the descendant, not by people of same ages. In a point, I partially agree with the statement the greatness of people might be decided uniquely by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. However, history in various field such as science and technology shows counterexamples to oppose it so I thought that each contemporaries can gauge the tremendous work of a personal. Therefore, the following essay will discuss extend of contents which need to be described for fully rich argument.</p><p class="p2"><br></p><p class="p1">Admittedly, speaking of the history of South Korea, where the hierarchical structure of politics are wide-spreading, objecting to the king of the Jo-Sun dynasty was definitely dangerous behavior in their period. Not only south Korea, but also most countries around the world have several histories of dictatorship or repressive society. Even in the modern society, some countries such as democratic of Korea still insist the autocracy with the president Kim as center. When the authority of the president are strong, contemporaries can hardly criticize the foundation of the nation such as organization of politic or government. Therefore, at that time, it was hard to write or state about the history of greatness of people. However, the period have been passed, the most state in the world adopt the democracy and it allows people to critic or admire the greatness of people from now on. The rest of essay will discuss the details of the trend of figuring out the excellent of the individuals.</p><p class="p2"><br></p><p class="p1"><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>First, people leading the state-of-the-art sometimes revered as the great man even though they as ever alive. For example, Bill gates, who found the one of the huge company, Microsoft, is regarded as the greatest man because of not only the assets of him, but also donation and consideration of the future of nature and leadership which realize the usability of the future devices by using the newest technologies of his company. For another example, the Mark Zuckerberg, founder of Facebook esteemed by the copious of leader in start-up firm because of the trials for giving opportunities for them.</p><p class="p2"><br></p><p class="p1"><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>Second, speaking of the judgement of contemporaries for a people, there is no reason to speak about the case what has been recorded in my history. In the history of science and technologies, the case of both greatest man recent period are not such a great incident. Newton or Edison, the name as a scientist and engineer, could be found even in the textbook of the middle-school. Thus, we have experienced and acknowledge already the copious of example what we have through the class of history or news in the way of living our daily life.</p>
<p class="p2"><span class="Apple-converted-space" style="font-size: 1.1em;"> </span><span style="font-size: 1.1em;">In conclusion, although there was some nations which halt and block the critics of the huge individuals at the periods with dictator or who have powerful authority in their time, we observed and agreed lots of counterexamples opposing this throughout the history of different fields. In addition, the judgement of the individuals is recently allowed because of the advent of democracy and the developement of quickly developement of the technologies. THe greatness of individuals are no longer things only decided by those who live after them, but also by their contemporaries.</span></p>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n style='font-size: 19.36px;'> This topic argues that the judgem...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, speaking of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 93.0 58.6224719101 159% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3288.0 2235.4752809 147% => OK
No of words: 566.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80918727915 5.05705443957 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87757670434 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 5.25720630253 2.79657885939 188% => OK
Unique words: 283.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 972.0 704.065955056 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 138.329855017 60.3974514979 229% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 193.411764706 118.986275619 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2941176471 23.4991977007 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 5.21951772744 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.97078651685 40% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19369544698 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924574349317 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143710428759 0.0758088955206 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177332834306 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174875551261 0.0667264976115 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.6 14.1392134831 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 48.8420337079 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 12.1743820225 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.01 12.1639044944 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 100.480337079 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.