The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are the only tools of human minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
One of the basic human nature is curiosity. To quell the curiosity human is able to find answers to many unsolved conundrums. As a result, human life got developed and most of our daily lives are involved with the machine in one way or another. But the human mind creates machines, not the other way around. The prompt sets about the superiority of the human mind over machines. While, in my opinion, I concede that machines are products of human minds, I mostly agree with the prompt for two reasons.
To begin, without instructions machines are useless. Once the idea, which seemed impossible, now due to the technological development of machines is an everyday thing but to navigate the machine one should need a human, otherwise, machines are useless without instructions. For example, printing machines are a necessary item in many areas, such as offices, schools, etc. Without it, the modern official works will stop. Printing machines are just the creations of the human mind. The only difference between printing machines and human is it prints too fast for a human being. But without instructions from a human, it can not operate. The above example illustrates that without a human’s instruction one machine is just a piece of metal. Though machine has more capacity than human, it is just the same work human can also do, but the machine does it more quickly and perfectly. More capacity does not mean it is superior, one who navigates them and makes machines was their needs is the superior one.
Furthermore, In the present technological era machine are essential tools in human life. From waking up in the morning to sleeping at night everywhere we use machines. But in present-day today's advanced machines will be tomorrow's backdated slow working machines. For instance not a decade ago we used the telephone in our home but we can not move it from place to place. Now in the present days, everyone has a phone and we can operate it from anywhere in the world. The above example shows that though Machines are a pivotal thing in our daily lives constant updating of the machine is needed; today's most updated version will be considered tomorrow’s junk. Thus constant updates of machines are needed and machines are human life's part. But the development meant will have to be done by a human. And it is the human mind's work to develop, otherwise, it will be backdated
However, though some machines were made for human development, sometimes it backfires, in other words, though the human mind is the creator of machines, sometimes machines take over. For example, the invention of artificial intelligence. In the recent, tech fair held by Yale University, the invention of artificial intelligence was first introduced to the world. Though the development process is in the primary stage, in a recent interview one of the recently introduced robots equipped with artificial intelligence was behaving on its own and threatening to destroy the human race. The above example illustrates that though the human mind is creative and machines are the fruit of the human mind, sometimes some development may cause harm rather than being lucrative. Obviously, machines make our life easier but sometimes they step out of the boundary.
I strongly believe that human minds are superior to machines in terms of the fact machines are creations of human beings is concerned. This is because machines cannot consider expansively, and, furthermore, cannot create unprecedented things. Even if the great abilities and skills of machines are considered, still they are all based upon human ability.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 660, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ion will be considered tomorrow’s junk. Thus constant updates of machines are needed...
^^^^
Line 6, column 873, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...develop, otherwise, it will be backdated However, though some machines were made ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 40.0 19.6327345309 204% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 11.1786427146 170% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 28.8173652695 118% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 55.5748502994 131% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3013.0 2260.96107784 133% => OK
No of words: 598.0 441.139720559 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03846153846 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94510247834 4.56307096286 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73919832406 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 204.123752495 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476588628763 0.468620217663 102% => OK
syllable_count: 982.8 705.55239521 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.67365269461 358% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.22255489022 237% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 19.7664670659 167% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.0939358484 57.8364921388 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.303030303 119.503703932 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1212121212 23.324526521 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57575757576 5.70786347227 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.67664670659 321% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345505356894 0.218282227539 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104399299922 0.0743258471296 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071301883807 0.0701772020484 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219486445681 0.128457276422 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226274896411 0.0628817314937 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.3799401198 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.3550499002 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.5979740519 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.32208582834 94% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 98.500998004 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 12.3882235529 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.