It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
The issue that it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero is a contentious one. While each side has its strengths and weaknesses, I believe we can not conclude that it is easy for anyone who is dead or alive to be a hero because of the limited availability of history, relative detrimental effects after a sacrifice, no one is perfect and neutral always.
First, no one is perfect, and if we consider someone as a hero, he may become overconfident and commit mistakes. If a nation considers someone as a hero, he may be overconfident in his life, and any small mistake he does in his life will be showcased in social media leading to the controversy of he being the hero. For example, if a nation praises a scientist as a hero for his recent discovery that can cure aids, social media will show even his traffic regulation mistakes as a big mistake to get their TRP rating. This would result in the degradation of his image as a hero. So, I think because no one is perfect, we can not regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Second, who is a hero? A hero is someone who thinks about his fellow beings before himself. Because it is challenging to be dispassionate in every situation, I believe it is difficult for a living man or woman to be a hero. For example, if there is a situation where his family is in a difficult situation, a hero can consider his family’s benefit before anyone, and it is justifiable. Although he is neutral in 80 percent of the time, we can not conclude that he is a hero because of the remaining 20 percent. As it is always difficult to give an unbiased opinion about everything, I believe it is impossible for a living man or woman to be a hero.
On the other hand, someone can argue that a dead man can be a hero. This statement is flawed because although we have all the information from the history that can confirm that his opinions were mainly based on the society and not on his surroundings, we can not conclude that the media can not find a piece of information in the future that can degrade his image as a hero. As we do not have complete information on anyone from the history because we depend entirely on the history books, we can not conclude that it is easy for someone who is dead to be a hero. I think it may be easy, but we can not be sure that the image will be permanent.
Also, someone might argue that if someone has sacrificed his life for the society, we can consider him as a hero. This point is unwarranted because the perspective with which someone looks at the sacrifice is relative. For example, if there is a suicide bomber in a war who is the reason for the killing of armies on both the sides, we can look at the sacrifice as a positive one because the war has ended and there are no more dangerous effects on one kingdom. On the other side, there could have been as a peaceful solution for the war which could have saved thousands of lives of soldiers. From one view, although it may seem to be heroic, we can not rule out the other side of the view that his sacrifice is detrimental. Therefore, we can not conclude that it is possible or easy for someone who has sacrificed himself to be a hero.
In conclusion, as no one is perfect, and no one who can be neutral always, I think it is not possible for a living man or woman to be a hero. Also, as there is a limited availability of history, relative detrimental effects after a sacrifice, I think we can not conclude that it is easy for the dead to be a hero.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 389, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...acrifice, no one is perfect and neutral always. First, no one is perfect, and if w...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'of the being'?
Suggestion: of the being
...social media leading to the controversy of he being the hero. For example, if a nation prai...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 51.0 19.5258426966 261% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 30.0 12.4196629213 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.3162921348 221% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 77.0 33.0505617978 233% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2867.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 670.0 442.535393258 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.27910447761 5.05705443957 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.08766726615 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63426747213 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.332835820896 0.4932671777 67% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 986.4 704.065955056 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 6.24550561798 320% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 12.0 3.10617977528 386% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.991344887 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.68 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 10.2758426966 214% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313286878669 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132619719506 0.0831039109588 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167187150011 0.0758088955206 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228969892574 0.150359130593 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120938333012 0.0667264976115 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.84 12.1639044944 64% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.