It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Change in virtually every society around the world is occurring at almost lightning speed. What has not changed is the significance of exceptional men and women who are called heroes. The prompt iterates that it is not possible to acclaim living people as heroes anymore, which is a conclusion I mostly agree with, while I concede that there are also people who deserve to be called heroes.
First, the adjective hero is such an immense burden on the shoulders of the relevant people that many can't carry it successfully enough to be able to called a hero when they approach their later years of lives. Because as it is once said, power is like a venom, and if not used properly that venom will consume its owner. There are many politicians in different democratic societies who came out as saviors with the votes of the people and in the end, they turned out to be tyrants who can't even tolerate a moderate opposition. The prime reason under this phenomenon is the fickle characteristic of people in general. Once they are loved and given the chance to control power, they lose their temper and suppose themselves as an infallible rulers. In this sense, exploitation of the politicians and key figures of power makes people disappoint people and thus, they refrain calling people as heroes.
Secondly, it is difficult to judge people in short notices and give them what they deserve. Maybe a person carries the basic requirements of being a hero, but it is hard to show resilience lifetime. Hence, such important compliments should not be given in a hasty manner. People should not only show the necessary courage to be a hero but also the endurance and stamina to prove that they deserve to be heroes. People should not acclaim important people readily. It is quite right that world need heroes, but it is also a fact that many undesirable consequences came out from unworthy hands of people who are praised by the societies, and it is always late to recant once they are carrying the title of hero. For example, once Hitler was a product of a functioning democracy. But people gave them something which he didn't deserve at all, and the results are obvious. He had to be warned when it was necessary to correct himself, and his ideas, but what happened as a consequence of his brazen actions was a result of undeserved title he was given. As seen, it is important to give people what they deserve in an appropriate time.
On the other hand, I concede that there are living heroes among people, and they deserve to be called such. Teachers, engineers, politicians, etc., who work for the well being of a society all deserve to be called heroes, since, the mission they shoulder is a unique one which people need the most in this troublesome periods. People should identify them well and treat them as heroes of societies for they aim to build a better future for us and our children. All in all, I mostly agree with the prompt stating that it is impossible to regard living people as heroes, since it is difficult to carry this title and it is tough to judge people in a short period of time to be able to give them a strong title as hero.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 103, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ulders of the relevant people that many cant carry it successfully enough to be able...
^^^^
Line 4, column 487, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... end, they turned out to be tyrants who cant even tolerate a moderate opposition. Th...
^^^^
Line 4, column 741, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'ruler'?
Suggestion: ruler
...and suppose themselves as an infallible rulers. In this sense, exploitation of the pol...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 254, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a hasty manner" with adverb for "hasty"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...portant compliments should not be given in a hasty manner. People should not only show the necess...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 817, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...But people gave them something which he didnt deserve at all, and the results are obv...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 655, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... it is tough to judge people in a short period of time to be able to give them a strong title ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, in general, in short, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 42.0 19.5258426966 215% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2593.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 559.0 442.535393258 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63864042934 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86242540663 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51312713589 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45259391771 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 835.2 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7762684385 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.739130435 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3043478261 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08695652174 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124466382639 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417899311988 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469742690588 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999812057126 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525797827643 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.