"It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the
public."
It is rightly said in today's world, Information is a treasure and one who acquires it leaps ahead the crowd by miles in metaphorical sense. Right to information must be a fundamental right to all the citizens of a country or denizens of a community. Withholding of information is a debateable and subjective issue and dissemination of information cannot be objective, as contrasting as black and white. The Political leaders who are responsible for the upliftment of the people of their community should be reasonable enough to disseminate the information to the public.
The political leaders who are elected by the general public must acknowledge their social obligations towards the people of the community to serve them and communicate with them. A perfect leader is one who communicates with his team and works alongside with them, maintaining a responsible position of judging the merit of the team's opinion compared to their own. The leader should not withhold facts and informations from his team or group that he wants to lead, as know one would have the confidence to proceed ahead without a proper presage. Taking the above example we can justify that it is the responsibility and moral obligation of a politician to divulge neccessary information to the general public he represents.
It serves as a progress report to the public, coming from the Politician themselves. This would in the long run benefit them, as the general public might be content that they have a clear simulacrum of the situation the politician is in and that transparency is being maintained. This bolsters the trust for the politician among the people and the syngergy of the politican-people dynamic is maintained peacefully.
Withholding information from the people and appropriating the same would be a major set back to the democratic nature of any government. This would inturn result in underpinning authoratarian regimes and give them an advantage to hide their misdeed from the public. It's disrespect towards public sentiment at its best and that what will be cultivated with vigor if this is enabled. We can take the example of a southeast Asian country called India where the politicians and the government has refused to delineate the current umemployability rate of the country to its people. At a time when expert believe the unemployment rate to be at a 45 year high across the nation, the politicians pursing their lips on this issue, is concerning to the the people. This is disservice towards the people who had elected the government and it's consitituent politicians at the first place.
Though, some people may argue that information cannot always be disseminated to the people. It is agreeable that informations regarding that are sensitive and realate to national interests, that can lead to breach in safety and security of the people, must be withheld at all costs till the issue is dealt with. This might include intelligence regarding terrorist activities or violent dissident factions within the borders and similar threats pertaining to national safety.
Relying on the above reasoning and justification it can be asserted that the withholding information by politicians from their people should never be appropriated in most cases, with few exceptions in matters of national security and similar issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 464, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s who are responsible for the upliftment of the people of their community should ...
^^
Line 2, column 46, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...olitical leaders who are elected by the general public must acknowledge their social obligatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 328, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teams'' or 'team's'?
Suggestion: teams'; team's
...le position of judging the merit of the teams opinion compared to their own. The lead...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 694, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...o divulge neccessary information to the general public he represents. It serves as a progress...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ld in the long run benefit them, as the general public might be content that they have a clear...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 722, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...cians pursing their lips on this issue, is concerning to the the people. This is disservice t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 739, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ir lips on this issue, is concerning to the the people. This is disservice towards the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 739, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ir lips on this issue, is concerning to the the people. This is disservice towards the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 877, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tituent politicians at the first place. Though, some people may argue that information...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, regarding, so, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2787.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 537.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18994413408 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81386128306 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09469306099 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478584729981 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 881.1 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7978813198 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.714285714 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.09523809524 5.21951772744 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202094897401 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692162838106 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598127377581 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112370998528 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554379400146 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 100.480337079 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.