It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Social group is the group of people of similar thoughts and believes. These groups are the one that help build the character of an individual. The prompt suggests that the association with the social group defines individual of that group. In my opinion, i mostly agree with the given statement for the following reasons.
Firstly, One learns from the group with whom he or she is closely associated. For an instance, when a child is born in a family, the child learns the social and moral behaviour from the parents and then with other members of the family. When, the child grows and starts going school he or she makes the bond with the like minded children and learns new behaviour. Thus, learning og behaviour is primarily associate with the group, so group does defines the individual.
Secondly, In politics the people of like minded are binded together with the principles they adhere. For an instance, In Nepal, the are majorly two parties that governs the country (i.e) Demactatic- Congress and Communist- UCPN and Maoist. So, the leaders and followers associated with the specific party has their specific believes and principles of building the nation. And, their believes helps us to identify therir motto and can elect as per the need of today.
Lastly, Some might argue that, it is not necessary that people of specific group exhibt specific quality. For an instance, the president or the prime-minister of the nation rather than representig their partis motto are principle, they exhibit neutral behaviour towards all the parties and sense of unity , while representing the antion in the international community. Also, such cases are rare that an odd one represents the group.
In conclusion, identification of individual is easy through our associated group. As, the social group that we blong to helps us to learn, guide and succeed in life, adhering the principles of that group.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'associated'.
Suggestion: associated
...hus, learning og behaviour is primarily associate with the group, so group does defines t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...they adhere. For an instance, In Nepal, the are majorly two parties that governs the co...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beliefs' (noun) instead of believes (verb)?
Suggestion: beliefs
...ples of building the nation. And, their believes helps us to identify therir motto and c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 305, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...wards all the parties and sense of unity , while representing the antion in the in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 315.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05714285714 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64034635182 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546031746032 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8089911242 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7058823529 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5294117647 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206695660901 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764723306372 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048572634911 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122942407683 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593567814072 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.