It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
“One day you will leave this world behind, so live a life you will remember”, A hook line from a famous song by Avicci. Although being a dance-pop number, this particular line is so deep with its intention. A lot of things can influence us from living a life that we deserve-- For example, being a slave to the “tag”, which our social groups give us. A lot can be related to the prompt for this essay. I believe that one must not be defined by the identification given by the social groups, which will be supported by two strong reasons.
First of all, It is known that every single one of us is unique in our own ways. Every one of us will difference inferences about life. This can be backed up with the famous saying, “None of the fingers are similar” though this might all seem irrelevant to the topic, it has more meaning to it than one can imagine. By obtaining this social “tag”, we are limited. Our entire perception of life is confined to this tag. To illustrate with an example, Aaryan, son of a business Tycoon, is a great singer, who has always aspired to become a musician. But the society or the “social groups” always expected him to follow his footsteps. It was his so call social “tag”, and he happened to the prisoner of this tag. Just like how they expected, he did follow his dad’s footsteps but he was never as successful as his father ever was. It was because of his limited perspective of life which caused by this go called social tags.
Secondly, Being the fictional character of our own play. As the spiderman said “With great power, comes great responsibility” I’d just like to modify it a little by saying, with great expectations, comes the greater responsibility. Expectation comes with a big parcel. In order for us to embrace the identification given by the social groups. For instance, Imagine the life of a mayor, he is always under the magnifying glass of the media and the public. And everybody is very quick to give identification to him. Little did they know, he was nothing like how they imagined him to be. The public was very sure that the mayor is very social, whereas he was not. They thought him to be very emotional, which surely he is not. Just because he was expected, he had to be at the gathering, befriending the ones who he doesn’t want to. This makes him a fictional character of his own play. One more reason why it is not advised to let the identification given by the social groups to mold us.
Although, it is not always a bad thing. It sometimes helps us achieve the best version of ourselves. Imagine a scenario, where the society identifies you as magnanimous and generous. It definitely motivates you to be the best version of yourselves.
To conclude, the prompt itself is very deep and this essay is just merely a small contribution to the very big picture. With that said, I strongly urge that nobody should limit their identification for social expectations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1008, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... given by the social groups to mold us. Although, it is not always a bad thing. It somet...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, for example, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 76.0 33.0505617978 230% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2489.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 527.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7229601518 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97702460282 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474383301708 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 792.9 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 6.24550561798 304% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.2370786517 163% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6707036935 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.4242424242 118.986275619 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9696969697 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75757575758 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168150577425 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476508591601 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503758498369 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951170719338 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354837084313 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 14.1392134831 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.