It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In today's world, we all are well aware of multiple personalities a person can have. Not treating this in a negative sense but actually analysing this phenomena we can say that a person behaves diffferently in different groups. A person would be more casual with his friends and with people of same age group whereas with family and elder people he might be more venerate.
Similarly different social groups might have disparate impressions of person. When claiming that a person defines himself or herself based on his identification with the social groups is ambiguos. Let us consider an example of an introvert person and an extrovert person. Introvert person will rarely be an active part of a social group and he might be identified as a boring person. Whereas in reality, he can be jovial person provided he feels comfortable. And just because he is identified as not so interesting person doesn't mean that he also defines himself on similar basis. In contrast when talking about extroverts, they might be garrulous. Although he can also be identified as the creating a convivial atmosphere but in reality he might be feeling low and wants to obscure that using his jokes. So his identification in the group and definition og himself are not abreast.
Looking into another point of view, as our elderly says that our circle of friends define us. This might not be completely false. When we start spending time with a particular group of people, we learn adapt some their qualities inadvertently which includes both the good and the bad ones. It can lead to change our inherent behaviour in accorddance to the that of the social group. So in some way, our identification in social group might define ourselves.
Considering the different point of views, we can say that our identification in the social group does contribute to the definition of ourselves but it is not necessarily the primary factor. The behaviour of a person might change completely from one social group to another but the definition would change.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...a negative sense but actually analysing this phenomena we can say that a person beha...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
... people he might be more venerate. Similarly different social groups might have disp...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 523, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...identified as not so interesting person doesnt mean that he also defines himself on si...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 585, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...so defines himself on similar basis. In contrast when talking about extroverts, they mig...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 203, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to adapt'
Suggestion: to adapt
... a particular group of people, we learn adapt some their qualities inadvertently whic...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, look, similarly, so, well, whereas, in contrast, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 341.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98240469208 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82368603864 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486803519062 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0537599017 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4210526316 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9473684211 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57894736842 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148581892559 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583482939415 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05578589121 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11497121962 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545524569926 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.