Laws are the necessary factor which ensures peace and harmony in the society. It is under the roof of laws that people can live peacefully without anxiety and fear. Stringent laws impose a code of conduct to be followed by all the citizens, as well as it induces the sense of fear which will impede them from involving in crimes. Laws play a vital role in bringing equity among the people. A fixed law will uphold the principles of government and strive for the establishment of peace and goodwill, among all faction of people so that they will live in amity and friendship.
But the statement posited holds water in certain scenarios too. The validity of the statement is conditional. Consider the example of legalising abortion. Until a while ago, it was considered as a crime leaving no choice for the women to take up the most important decision in their life. But now that the law is abolished, it leaves the individuals with a choice to make the best decision. Likewise, a planned murder and a murder that accidentally happened for self-defence have to be visualised as extreme incidents. I believe that in the latter scenario - if there are reasonable evidences - the person involved has to be considered as a victim rather than a murderer and has to be exculpated.
But in all of the above examples, it is of great significance to ensure that the flexibility is not being exploited. The chances of increase in crime rates will be high when there is a possibility to justify the crime upon false claims. Considering such jeopardised situations, it is better to have an unwavering law system rather than a flexible one. However, there are exceptions. The change of one-child rule in China is an exemplar of the importance of flexibility of laws. Under this law, the couples could have only one child to control the population, as China is the most populated country in the world. But after the earthquake in which many people lost their lives, China has withdrawn the law. Flexibility has to be ensured to the entire population rather than just to a faction.
The security of people is vital and it is important to have strict laws to ensure the same. Considering the same, it is better to have laws that are rigid or fixed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...er and has to be exculpated. But in all of the above examples, it is of great signific...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, likewise, so, well, while, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 390.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73846153846 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7501277847 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520512820513 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9136361111 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175330669796 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494064141529 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315760784168 0.0758088955206 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100290878436 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300728178183 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.