Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
There has been a spate of articles which has polarised people on whether laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times and places. Based on logical reasoning and a pragmatic approach it wouldnt be germane to quote that the laws have to be flexible and that, immutable laws per se have prone to have deleterious effects on the proper functioning of any system.
In an attempt to enlighten the importance of the aforementined flexible law, let us visualize a scene in which on old women who encountered an accident is lying unconscious on the road. She has already had sufficient blood loss and requires immediate actions to save her from the imminent death. In an attempt to dispatch her to a hospital as swiftly as possible, a youth inadvertently dodges the traffic signal with his speedy car, reaches the hospital in time and ultimately receives approbations of the doctors for having brought the lady at the right time to the hospital-which enabed them save a precious life. The person wasn't charged or arrested as he had helplessly broken the laws with an intent to save a life. This was plausible because the flexible laws had come to his rescue. This was fair enough, but imagine if the youth was caught on the way by the cops for this speedy drive and for disobeying traffic laws and was penalised and arrested ? Not only would it have led to loss of faith in humanity but would have also promoted people to adopt a cynical lifestyle. This illustration shows how insidious could immutable laws be !
While advocates and martinents opine their tenuous claims that laws are not something which are not supposed to flexbile and that every individual is contractually obligated to abide by the law, no matter what , erudite scholars disregard this as a flawed argument based on real life consequences of an intransigent system and its laws. As rightly quoted in the coda of an Indian Movie, Rakt Charitra - Helpness and merciless evil inflicts of the society is what a man becomes.
Therefore, it would be prudent and judicious to account for the reasons and other factors which led to a particular act of disobeying the law to a certain extent and then deciding the intensity of the mistake/legal action to be taken rather than a blatant objective analysis of the situation. Flexible laws promote a holistic look at the scenario and experience shows that it would indubitably strengthen the ties between the people and the system.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...l reasoning and a pragmatic approach it wouldnt be germane to quote that the laws have ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 629, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... them save a precious life. The person wasnt charged or arrested as he had helplessl...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ated to abide by the law, no matter what , erudite scholars disregard this as a fl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, look, so, then, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2056.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 420.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89523809524 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78849796434 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564285714286 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.1820766472 60.3974514979 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.153846154 118.986275619 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3076923077 23.4991977007 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201054786941 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725764515543 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818986553215 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130101439144 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718642521254 0.0667264976115 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 14.1392134831 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 48.8420337079 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.