The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times

Essay topics:

The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.

The prompt suggests that the primary benefit that one receive as a result of studying history is to cast off any confusion regarding the notion that the people from the earlier generations are no more different than the contemporary people. In my opinion, I mostly agree with this perception and argue that history teaches us that we are closer to the people that have preceded us more than we think we are.
To begin, a student of history, someone who is keen and able to connect the dots, will eventually notice from studying history that the events in our present soceity is similar in nature with the past events. We have vast historical records of the major past events and a careful study of these events reveal the striking similary of them with the present ones. For example, the stock market crash of 2008, although impacted the stock market in a way that no other crash had done before, was not the first of its kind. It had a marked similarity with the great depression of the 1930s. The events leading up to the stock market crash of 2008 was no different than the events that was responsible for the great depression. One can assume that, after such a worldwide devastating impact, the world would never have to see another major financial depression. Although circumstances changed, peoples' nature did not and this is overtly visible from the study of history. Humans have an inclination to recognize patterns and history enables us to utilize this tendency to see the bigger picture: the past and the present are intertwined.
Secondly, history divulge that not only the major historical events in politics, economy or society have repeated over time but also the quotidian aspects of peoples' lives in the present can have its roots traced back to earlier times. With the invention of writing began the journey of history, and for the first time it allowed human beings to pass on knowledge earned over their lifetime to their offsprings. This, coupled with the fact that writing enabled the preservation of knowledge over a long period of time compared to that of oral transfer, meant a person could verifiably study the history and discover the similarities between the past socieites and the present socieities. The institutions that govern our daily lives, the culuture that we are a part of and the societal rules that bind us together can be found in earlier generations too, although in a miniature form. For example, anthropoligcal studies have unfolded that earlier societies had more or less the same norms as we do, with a bit of quirk of their own. Nowadays we have sophisticated genres of painting, but painting can also be traced back to thousands of years, as the discovery of a painting in a spanish cave where the humans are hunting bisons have shown. We also have had rich literature in various different languages for thousands of years. This shows that the similarity people possess transcend the passage of time.
Although the claim that human societies have evolved and diverged over time has some truth in it, the foundations have remained largely intact. Starting from the industrial revolution, our societies have changed significantly and current technological innovations have only accelerated the pace. People are now opening up to topics that were taboo in the past. Change is a constant to be found in human nature. The changes that we are responsible for will also become part of the history one day, and the future generations who will find their footing on those changes, will look back and realize that they can relate to us through history.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...rlier generations are no more different than the contemporary people. In my opinion,...
^^^^
Line 2, column 659, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...k market crash of 2008 was no different than the events that was responsible for the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... time it allowed human beings to pass on knowledge earned over their lifetime to ...
^^
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e preservation of knowledge over a long period of time compared to that of oral transfer, mean...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cave where the humans are hunting bisons have shown. We also have had rich litera...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, for example, as a result, in my opinion, more or less

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.3162921348 221% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 58.0 33.0505617978 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 86.0 58.6224719101 147% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2986.0 2235.4752809 134% => OK
No of words: 610.0 442.535393258 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89508196721 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96972615649 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59365608124 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 290.0 215.323595506 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475409836066 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 945.0 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0665667286 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.826086957 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5217391304 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95652173913 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20132806665 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591609277029 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603331065195 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129166333217 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370659817771 0.0667264976115 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 100.480337079 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.