The main purpose of any company or business organisation is to increase profit. A profit can only be increased by improving productivity and efficiency of various departments within an organisation. Thus, most of companies often hire outside consultants at high rate to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. Though these outside adviser are quite good at identifying obstacles that reduce the efficiency of a company, I suggest that companies should spend more time listening to their own employees to increase the productivity of a companies.
First of all, these hired outside consultants are unfamiliar with the typical procedure unique to any specific business enterprise. So, in order to get best suggestion about how to run a company in a most cost efficient way, a company has to reveal its specific procedure to the consultants. And consultants may reveal that specific strategy to his/her other clients which is not acceptable for any business enterprise. Thus, most companies insignificant details about its working procedure and hide important details of any specific department. And if consultant do not have sufficient information then their advice would not be fruitful.
Second problem with hiring outside consultants is their charges for providing advice. If companies pay high charges to the consultants then they expect better advice to run a company. As we discussed that in absence of all the details, the advice of outside consultant may be proved futile. Thus, at the end companies will not get that much benefit from outside consultants and waste their time and money on hired consultants.
Finally, who better understand and know internal structure and working procedure of a companies than their own employees? Another benefit of taking advice from its employees is that it is a free of charge and as a consequence of taking suggestion from its employee bonding between employer and employees become strong. Because, there is good understanding between employer and employees of a company, its definitely increase the efficiency and thus, raise the profit of a company. Thus, if business organisations spend more time listening to their own employees then they can eliminate obstacles in working method within any department.
In conclusion, though hire outside consultants are good at in their profession of advising, companies should take advice from its own employees on how to increase the productivity and what are some problems that reduce the efficiency of a business organisation. Thus, companies will be able to increase profit in most cost efficient way and also employer-empoyees bond will become strong.
The main purpose of any company or business organisation is to increase profit. A profit can only be increased by improving productivity and efficiency of various departments within an organisation. Thus, most of companies often hire outside consultants at high rate to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. Though these outside adviser are quite good at identifying obstacles that reduce the efficiency of a company, I suggest that companies should spend more time listening to their own employees to increase the productivity of a companies.
First of all, these hired outside consultants are unfamiliar with the typical procedure unique to any specific business enterprise. So, in order to get best suggestion about how to run a company in a most cost efficient way, a company has to reveal its specific procedure to the consultants. And consultants may reveal that specific strategy to his/her other clients which is not acceptable for any business enterprise. Thus, most companies insignificant details about its working procedure and hide important details of any specific department. And if consultant do not have sufficient information then their advice would not be fruitful.
Second problem with hiring outside consultants is their charges for providing advice. If companies pay high charges to the consultants then they expect better advice to run a company. As we discussed that in absence of all the details, the advice of outside consultant may be proved futile. Thus, at the end companies will not get that much benefit from outside consultants and waste their time and money on hired consultants.
Finally, who better understand and know internal structure and working procedure of a companies than their own employees? Another benefit of taking advice from its employees is that it is a free of charge and as a consequence of taking suggestion from its employee bonding between employer and employees become strong. Because, there is good understanding between employer and employees of a company, its definitely increase the efficiency and thus, raise the profit of a company. Thus, if business organisations spend more time listening to their own employees then they can eliminate obstacles in working method within any department.
In conclusion, though hire outside consultants are good at in their profession of advising, companies should take advice from its own employees on how to increase the productivity and what are some problems that reduce the efficiency of a business organisation. Thus, companies will be able to increase profit in most cost efficient way and also employer-empoyees bond will become strong.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the companies') or simply say ''most companies''.
Suggestion: most of the companies; most companies
...partments within an organisation. Thus, most of companies often hire outside consultants at high ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 553, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a company' or simply 'companies'?
Suggestion: a company; companies
...ployees to increase the productivity of a companies. First of all, these hired outside c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'get the best'.
Suggestion: get the best
...ic business enterprise. So, in order to get best suggestion about how to run a company i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... is their charges for providing advice. If companies pay high charges to the consu...
^^
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., at the end companies will not get that much benefit from outside consultants an...
^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a company' or simply 'companies'?
Suggestion: a company; companies
...rnal structure and working procedure of a companies than their own employees? Another benef...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 402, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...en employer and employees of a company, its definitely increase the efficiency and ...
^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oyer-empoyees bond will become strong.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, may, second, so, then, thus, as to, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2256.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38424821002 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03763022509 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434367541766 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 710.1 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7027495379 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.736842105 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0526315789 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68421052632 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.47872013049 0.243740707755 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169634051836 0.0831039109588 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151689710687 0.0758088955206 200% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297951943093 0.150359130593 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.188460472006 0.0667264976115 282% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.