Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men and women into space. Therefore, we should invest our resources in unmanned space flight
The following arugment is flawed for some numerous reason. Though Manned spaces flight are costly and dangerous and unmanned spaces are not costly and dangerous, before investing resources in unmanned space flight the editor of the national aeronautics need to be clear about some following points.
Although manned space flight is costly and dangerous, here is no enough information about how much this space flight is costly and whether it is possible to make it less dangerous or not. If this space flight can provide such information which information can not gather from any unmanned space flight, the editor of the national aeronautics need to think how to collect information by minimizing cost and dangerous level. No direct information about how much the manned space flight is dangerous. Is the dangerous level is death or just we need to be cautious to avoid dangerous.
The series of unmanned space is recently successful. Though unmanned spaces are recently successful, there is no enough information how much these spaces are successful.Again, though a series of unmanned space become success is not means all unmaneed spaces will be successful. As unmanned spaces are recently successful, this spaces were not successful in past. The editor of the national aeronautics need to be clear how they achive success in unmanned spaces recently. the editor of the national aeronautics need to think, is it possible to bring similar change in manned space and bring success in manned spaces. Unmanned spaces are capable to gather useful information without costs and avoiding risks, but theres is no much evidence about hou much these information are useful.
Before investing resources in unmanned space flight, the editor of the national aeronautics need to be clear about the above information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sting resources in unmanned space flight the editor of the national aeronautics n...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... clear about some following points. Although manned space flight is costly a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...how to collect information by minimizing cost and dangerous level. No direct info...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to be cautious to avoid dangerous. The series of unmanned space is recently...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Again
...on how much these spaces are successful.Again, though a series of unmanned space beco...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...essful, this spaces were not successful in past. The editor of the national aeronautics...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...e success in unmanned spaces recently. the editor of the national aeronautics need...
^^^
Line 5, column 722, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...n without costs and avoiding risks, but theres is no much evidence about hou much thes...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 732, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...costs and avoiding risks, but theres is no much evidence about hou much these info...
^^
Line 5, column 764, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...eres is no much evidence about hou much these information are useful. Before investin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... much these information are useful. Before investing resources in unmanned s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ting resources in unmanned space flight, the editor of the national aeronautics n...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 33.0505617978 30% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 289.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.276816609 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75279034278 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 215.323595506 52% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.387543252595 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.9 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.2060003773 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.307692308 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.846153846154 5.21951772744 16% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421980485351 0.243740707755 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195240747186 0.0831039109588 235% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0936753880286 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276949502604 0.150359130593 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890046084959 0.0667264976115 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 100.480337079 45% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.