Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.
Stating that it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another, the view claims that many important discoveries or creations are accidental. In some sense, considering human history, it is deniable that many historical discoveries, researches or other kinds of achievement unintentionally occur. In my opinion, however, all great feats didn’t come from haphazard cases. Moreover, we can see many cases that carefully designed plans to solve questions make great things better.
Of course, few would disagree that unconscious questioning to problems is effective to seek the answers of them. Especially when the problem is too hard and gigantic to resolve it, continuous endeavor accidentally leads to resolution. For example, Columbus wanted to find seaway to India. However. he acted and did his best following his belief that he could find it. On his sailing, he landed on a continental that he called it ‘India’ at that time. In fact, he discovered totally new land called America nowadays. This implies that effort for one question by chance can lead to a great feat which is an answer to another question
Nonetheless, can we say that coincidence is central to important discoveries? No, in terms of scientific research, carefully and an intentionally designed plan is helpful to make great theories. For example, when Darwin made his theory about evolution, he collected all kind of specimens which were related to his thought and revised and revised endlessly to make a perfect theory. The point is that, in some cases, especially science, coincidence cannot be helpful
Moreover, regarding the creation, we can say literature and clothes come from creators’ thought in mind. The most clothes have designers’ intentions or emotions which they want to express through their work and almost literature have structure and narratives to convey lessons which authors want to give readers. That most kinds of these artists work come from designed plan indicates that well-intended thought would key to make masterpieces.
To summarize, the speaker has overlooked the importance of an aimed plan for making a step toward the progress of the certain field. Although fortune has played a key role in many important discoveries, at least up until now, purposed intent is necessarily the key to human creation
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...olumbus wanted to find seaway to India. However. he acted and did his best following hi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...anted to find seaway to India. However. he acted and did his best following his be...
^^
Line 3, column 642, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t which is an answer to another question Nonetheless, can we say that coincidence...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, so, well, while, at least, for example, in fact, kind of, of course, in my opinion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2014.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 378.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32804232804 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99923937989 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582010582011 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4281318101 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.888888889 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.21951772744 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299092321894 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921306134341 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.198253714705 0.0758088955206 262% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15881195711 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171482524705 0.0667264976115 257% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.